Hi Hannes,
I get it. There are lots of sibling morphs. RectangleMorph doesn't need font or emphasis for
sure.
And, adding a class to the hierarchy simply to contain the method would not be desirable
either.
Geez who came up with this idea, anyway?
- Dan
On 8 Sep 2015 at 19:24, H. Hirzel wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> No. The three morphs you mention all have instance variables
>
> font emphasis
>
> whereas the sibling morphs do not have these variables neither does
> Morph.
>
> So the reason of not doing it is that we do not want these
> instance
> variables to be in the other Morphs where they are not used.
>
> --Hannes
>
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The following implement #initWithContents:font:emphasis:
> identically:
> >
> > MinimalStringMorph
> > OneLineEditorMorph
> > StringMorph
> >
> > and they all inherit from:
> >
> > Morph
> > RectangleLikeMorph
> >
> > So, refactoring seems to be in order, maybe by pulling
> > #initWithContents:font:emphasis: up
> > into Morph. What do you think?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cuis mailing list
> > http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cuis mailing list
> http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
_______________________________________________
Cuis mailing list
[hidden email]
http://jvuletich.org/mailman/listinfo/cuis_jvuletich.org
Locked
