Initializing a new JavaScript object

Ok. Inspecting on both objects though gives a HashedCollection so maybe inspection is not accurate enough.

|jsObj|

jsObj := #{ 'x'->23. 'y'->42 }.

jsObj:=HashedCollection new.

jsObj at:'x' put:23.

jsObj at:'y' put:42;yourself.

2013/2/14 Tom <[hidden email]>

Thanxalot :)

I should have mentioned earlier. I am looking for a way to copy/paste
some JSON Arrays into Smalltalk objects.

On 14 Feb., 16:25, Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> > Use a HashedCollection object instead. I think it is exactly the same.
>
> Not _exactly_ (HashedCollection is deeper subclass, it is not wrapping
> plain JS Object), but it can be used in lots of places instead of plain
> object (jQuery options, css etc., all works).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > 2013/2/14 Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <[hidden email]
> > <mailto:[hidden email]>>

>
> >     The new interpreter doesnt allow to have both smalltalk and
> >     javascript code at the same method or workspace.
>

> >     2013/2/14 Tom <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>>

>
> >         Hi everybody,
>
> >         how comes, I cannot evaluate the following in the workspace...
>
> >         jsObj := <{}>.
>
> >         All I get is an alert() saying: "Parse error on line 1 column 17 :
> >         Unexpected character <"
>
> >         Any suggestions?
>
> >         --
> >         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >         Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
> >         To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> >         it, send an email to [hidden email]
> >         <mailto:[hidden email]>.

> >         For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

>
> >     --
>
> >     Sincerely yours,
>
> >           Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>
> > --
>
> > Sincerely yours,
>
> >       Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "amber-lang" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to [hidden email].

> > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--

Sincerely yours, 

     Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Hello Sebastian,

In the latest versions of Amber it is not possible to put inline js mixed with Smalltalk code in a single method.

What prevents you from using a collection in this case?

Best,
Manfred

Hello Sebastian,

In the latest versions of Amber it is not possible to put inline js mixed with Smalltalk code in a single method.

What prevents you from using a collection in this case?

Best,
Manfred

data := #{}.
Should do.

---

From: Manfred Kröhnert
Sent: 22/08/2013 23:30
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [amber-lang] Re: Initializing a new JavaScript object

Hello Sebastian,

In the latest versions of Amber it is not possible to put inline js mixed with Smalltalk code in a single method.

What prevents you from using a collection in this case?

Best,
Manfred

Am 22.08.2013 23:26 schrieb "Sebastian Heidbrink" <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 I just upgrade some older amber stuff of mine to the most current version.

I do have a problem with inlining and I do not know how to reimplement it in the current version.


    | data |
   <data = {}>.
  data at: 'x' put: ('.x input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'y' put: ('.y input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'z' put: ('.z input') asJQuery val.

 in the old version I could use my data object stuff like:

 data x printString

No matter how I change my old code I do always get an error "nil does not understand #at:put:" or:
" ""someother class instance like HashedCollection"" does not understand #x"

How am I supposed to reimplement such thing for the new Amber version?

Thanks
Sebastian


Am 14.02.2013 07:43, schrieb Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis:

Ok. Inspecting on both objects though gives a HashedCollection so maybe inspection is not accurate enough.

|jsObj|

jsObj := #{ 'x'->23. 'y'->42 }.

jsObj:=HashedCollection new.

jsObj at:'x' put:23.

jsObj at:'y' put:42;yourself.

2013/2/14 Tom <[hidden email]>

Thanxalot :)

I should have mentioned earlier. I am looking for a way to copy/paste
some JSON Arrays into Smalltalk objects.

On 14 Feb., 16:25, Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> > Use a HashedCollection object instead. I think it is exactly the same.
>

[The entire original message is not included.]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

data := #{}.
Should do.

---

From: Manfred Kröhnert
Sent: 22/08/2013 23:30
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [amber-lang] Re: Initializing a new JavaScript object

Hello Sebastian,

In the latest versions of Amber it is not possible to put inline js mixed with Smalltalk code in a single method.

What prevents you from using a collection in this case?

Best,
Manfred

Am 22.08.2013 23:26 schrieb "Sebastian Heidbrink" <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 I just upgrade some older amber stuff of mine to the most current version.

I do have a problem with inlining and I do not know how to reimplement it in the current version.


    | data |
   <data = {}>.
  data at: 'x' put: ('.x input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'y' put: ('.y input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'z' put: ('.z input') asJQuery val.

 in the old version I could use my data object stuff like:

 data x printString

No matter how I change my old code I do always get an error "nil does not understand #at:put:" or:
" ""someother class instance like HashedCollection"" does not understand #x"

How am I supposed to reimplement such thing for the new Amber version?

Thanks
Sebastian


Am 14.02.2013 07:43, schrieb Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis:

Ok. Inspecting on both objects though gives a HashedCollection so maybe inspection is not accurate enough.

|jsObj|

jsObj := #{ 'x'->23. 'y'->42 }.

jsObj:=HashedCollection new.

jsObj at:'x' put:23.

jsObj at:'y' put:42;yourself.

2013/2/14 Tom <[hidden email]>

Thanxalot :)

I should have mentioned earlier. I am looking for a way to copy/paste
some JSON Arrays into Smalltalk objects.

On 14 Feb., 16:25, Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> > Use a HashedCollection object instead. I think it is exactly the same.
>

[The entire original message is not included.]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

I think you need to use dot as separated instead of comma. Comma is concatenation.

---

From: Sebastian Heidbrink
Sent: 22/08/2013 23:58
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [amber-lang] Re: Initializing a new JavaScript object

Well, the problem is that when I do so, I get a
"a HashedCollection ('x' -> '1' , 'y' -> '2' , 'z' -> '3') does not understand x"
Error

data := #{}. was my first idea, too....

Sebastian


Am 22.08.2013 14:47, schrieb László Tordai:

data := #{}.
Should do.

---

From: Manfred Kröhnert
Sent: 22/08/2013 23:30
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [amber-lang] Re: Initializing a new JavaScript object

Hello Sebastian,

In the latest versions of Amber it is not possible to put inline js mixed with Smalltalk code in a single method.

What prevents you from using a collection in this case?

Best,
Manfred

Am 22.08.2013 23:26 schrieb "Sebastian Heidbrink" <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 I just upgrade some older amber stuff of mine to the most current version.

I do have a problem with inlining and I do not know how to reimplement it in the current version.


    | data |
   <data = {}>.
  data at: 'x' put: ('.x input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'y' put: ('.y input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'z' put: ('.z input') asJQuery val.

 in the old version I could use my data object stuff like:

 data x printString

No matter how I change my old code I do always get an error "nil does not understand #at:put:" or:
" ""someother class instance like HashedCollection"" does not understand #x"

How am I supposed to reimplement such thing for the new Amber version?

Thanks
Sebastian


Am 14.02.2013 07:43, schrieb Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis:

Ok. Inspecting on both objects though gives a HashedCollection so maybe inspection is not accurate enough.

|jsObj|

jsObj := #{ 'x'->23. 'y'->42 }.

jsObj:=HashedCollection new.

jsObj at:'x' put:23.

jsObj at:'y' put:42;yourself.

2013/2/14 Tom <[hidden email]>

Thanxalot :)

I should have mentioned earlier. I am looking for a way to copy/paste
some JSON Arrays into Smalltalk objects.

On 14 Feb., 16:25, Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> > Use a HashedCollection object instead. I think it is exactly the same.
>

[The entire original message is not included.]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[The entire original message is not included.]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Oh,... I wrote that misleading.

That is the message I get in the debugger doing this:

| data |
   data := #{}.
  data at: 'x' put: ('.x input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'y' put: ('.y input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'z' put: ('.z input') asJQuery val.

   data x printString

 with the old version and the "native object" <data = {}>. it worked very well.
 I do not really want to reimplement all the code that was implemented like that...

I guess JSProxyObject is not an option right?

Sebastian



Am 22.08.2013 15:05, schrieb László Tordai:

I think you need to use dot as separated instead of comma. Comma is concatenation.

---

From: Sebastian Heidbrink
Sent: 22/08/2013 23:58
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [amber-lang] Re: Initializing a new JavaScript object

Well, the problem is that when I do so, I get a
"a HashedCollection ('x' -> '1' , 'y' -> '2' , 'z' -> '3') does not understand x"
Error

data := #{}. was my first idea, too....

Sebastian


Am 22.08.2013 14:47, schrieb László Tordai:

data := #{}.
Should do.

---

From: Manfred Kröhnert
Sent: 22/08/2013 23:30
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [amber-lang] Re: Initializing a new JavaScript object

Hello Sebastian,

In the latest versions of Amber it is not possible to put inline js mixed with Smalltalk code in a single method.

What prevents you from using a collection in this case?

Best,
Manfred

Am 22.08.2013 23:26 schrieb "Sebastian Heidbrink" <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 I just upgrade some older amber stuff of mine to the most current version.

I do have a problem with inlining and I do not know how to reimplement it in the current version.


    | data |
   <data = {}>.
  data at: 'x' put: ('.x input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'y' put: ('.y input') asJQuery val.
  data at: 'z' put: ('.z input') asJQuery val.

 in the old version I could use my data object stuff like:

 data x printString

No matter how I change my old code I do always get an error "nil does not understand #at:put:" or:
" ""someother class instance like HashedCollection"" does not understand #x"

How am I supposed to reimplement such thing for the new Amber version?

Thanks
Sebastian


Am 14.02.2013 07:43, schrieb Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis:

Ok. Inspecting on both objects though gives a HashedCollection so maybe inspection is not accurate enough.

|jsObj|

jsObj := #{ 'x'->23. 'y'->42 }.

jsObj:=HashedCollection new.

jsObj at:'x' put:23.

jsObj at:'y' put:42;yourself.

2013/2/14 Tom <[hidden email]>

Thanxalot :)

I should have mentioned earlier. I am looking for a way to copy/paste
some JSON Arrays into Smalltalk objects.

On 14 Feb., 16:25, Herby Vojčík <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> > Use a HashedCollection object instead. I think it is exactly the same.
>

[The entire original message is not included.]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[The entire original message is not included.]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.