Is GLMRoassalEasel correctly packaged?

   Hi doru

Is GLMRoassalEasel correctly packaged because Glamour-Tools just
requires Glamour-Core

and I have the impression that GLM-RoassalEasel should be in
Glamour-Roassal something.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

tx

Stef

Done.

Doru

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:

Indeed. This was a refactoring that was left in the middle. I will move them.

Doru

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 9:41 PM, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote:

  Hi doru

Is GLMRoassalEasel correctly packaged because Glamour-Tools just requires Glamour-Core

and I have the impression that GLM-RoassalEasel should be in Glamour-Roassal something.

Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev