Is OldSocket still useful?

It does not seem to be referenced anymore.

Noury
http://vst.ensm-douai.fr/noury/
--------------
-17èmes Journées Francophones sur les Systèmes Multi-Agents
(JFSMA’09). Lyon, 19-21 Octobre 2009 - http://bat710.univ-lyon1.fr/~sycosma/JFSMA09/

-2nd International Workshop on Agent Technology for Disaster
Management (ATDM'09), Nagoya, Japan, Dec. 13rd, 2009 - http://doesnotunderstand.org/wikka.php?wakka=ATDM2009

-16ème Conférence francophone sur les Langages et Modèles à Objets
(LMO). Pau 2010 - http://lmo-conference.org/2010

-ESUG 18th International Smalltalk Conference - Barcelona, Spain 2010
http://www.esug.org/Conferences/2010









_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

On 02.10.2009, at 19:53, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Noury Bouraqadi <[hidden email]
> > wrote:
> It does not seem to be referenced anymore.
>
>
> Weird...look what I found:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=275&can=1&q=OldSocket&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Milestone
>
> perhaps it was actually never integrated?
>

It was... maybe Monticello did not delete the class. There are
sometimes problems with removing classes.

       Marcus

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

2009/10/6 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>:

> ok, I changed the status of
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=275
>
> it should be integrated again ?

Done in 10468

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project