Is RBRefactoryChange alive, and what do I use for recategorization

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Is RBRefactoryChange alive, and what do I use for recategorization

Uko2
Hi everyone.

in my critic projects I need a concept of a “change” the can be previewed, executed or combined with other changes. I.e. if a critic can propose an automated solution, it has to be _something_. At the moment I’ve started to use RBRefactoryChange, but I want to know whether it is the thing to use, or maybe someone is preparing a replacement. Because classes have no comments. no real diff support and so on…

If it is the thing to use, which change should I use for a recategorization (change protocol) of a method?

Thanks.
Uko
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is RBRefactoryChange alive, and what do I use for recategorization

Max Leske
Martin has been working on change reification to manage history. I’m not sure however, if that’s been integrated. CC’d to Martin.

> On 06 Nov 2015, at 15:25, Yuriy Tymchuk <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone.
>
> in my critic projects I need a concept of a “change” the can be previewed, executed or combined with other changes. I.e. if a critic can propose an automated solution, it has to be _something_. At the moment I’ve started to use RBRefactoryChange, but I want to know whether it is the thing to use, or maybe someone is preparing a replacement. Because classes have no comments. no real diff support and so on…
>
> If it is the thing to use, which change should I use for a recategorization (change protocol) of a method?
>
> Thanks.
> Uko