Issue 276 in glassdb: ByteArray [un]signed<size>At: selectors

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Issue 276 in glassdb: ByteArray [un]signed<size>At: selectors

glassdb
Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium GLASS-Server Version-1.0-beta.8

New issue 276 by [hidden email]: ByteArray [un]signed<size>At: selectors
http://code.google.com/p/glassdb/issues/detail?id=276

 From Joe Blake  
(http://forum.world.st/ByteArray-un-signed-lt-size-gt-At-selectors-td3590350.html):

There are a bunch of selectors for converting bytes in ByteArray's into  
integers that are different in Squeak and GemStone.

[un]signedByteAt: vs [un]signed8At:
[un]signedShortAt: vs [un]signed16At:
<noSqueakEquiv> vs [un]signed24At:
[un]signedLongAt: vs [un]signed32At:
[un]signedLongLongAt: (notYetImplemented) vs [un]signed64At:

...and of course the atut: versions of these methods as well.

Personally I like the GS naming better.

This is something I'm only running in GS so it's no bother - just thought  
I'd mention it to the compatibility committee


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 276 in glassdb: ByteArray [un]signed<size>At: selectors

glassdb
Updates:
        Labels: Milestone-1.0-beta.8.7

Comment #1 on issue 276 by [hidden email]: ByteArray  
[un]signed<size>At: selectors
http://code.google.com/p/glassdb/issues/detail?id=276

(No comment was entered for this change.)

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 276 in glassdb: ByteArray [un]signed<size>At: selectors

glassdb
Updates:
        Labels: -Milestone-1.0-beta.8.7

Comment #2 on issue 276 by [hidden email]: ByteArray  
[un]signed<size>At: selectors
http://code.google.com/p/glassdb/issues/detail?id=276

(No comment was entered for this change.)