Issue 3291 in pharo: Missing text field with completion

> Why two lists when one list is enough?
>
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-completion-dialog
>
> Lukas
>
> On 24 November 2010 19:08, Alain Plantec<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>> Dear list,
>> I'm not should it's enough clear so
>> a screenshot is attached.
>> Cheers
>> Alain
>>
>
>

> Hi Lukas,
> ok, I've plugged the textfield with completion (surely a bad name) in the find class for testing only.
> I don't like the two lists also.
> The purpose is to have a normal text field which popup a list of possible answers only
> when you typin something in the field.
> So, its a basic widget which, afaik is missing and that could be used with ob-tools.
> btw: even with ob find class, add category, etc, I would prefer to see only one simple text field.
> Cheers
> Alain
>
> Le 25/11/2010 00:33, Lukas Renggli a écrit :
>> Why two lists when one list is enough?
>>
>> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch/blog/ob-completion-dialog
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> On 24 November 2010 19:08, Alain Plantec<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>> Dear list,
>>> I'm not should it's enough clear so
>>> a screenshot is attached.
>>> Cheers
>>> Alain
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

> I suggest to make
> that a standard widget so that other tools outside of OB can take
> advantage too.
>
> It is simple subclass of DialogWindow morph from Polymorph and can be
> fully configured and opened for example like this:
>
>     OBCompletionRequest new
>         prompt: 'Find Class';
>         searchBlock: [ :string | self findClassIn: target environment
> pattern: string ];
>         labelBlock: [ :class | class name ];
>         iconBlock: [ :class | class browserIcon ];
>         signal
>
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
>
>

> Le 25/11/2010 12:03, Lukas Renggli a écrit :
>>> So, its a basic widget which, afaik is missing and that could be used with
>>> ob-tools.
>> I don't follow what you and Francisco are saying.
>>
>> IMHO there is a much better widget already in OB.
> sorry but why much better?
> OBCompletionRequest is a dialog.
> What I propose is to enrich PluggableTextFieldMorph
> with the possibility to use a completion list.
> So we have two differents things here.
> And indeed, OBCompletionRequest should be named CompletionRequest
> and integrated in the core.
> Showing it in the browser find class was not a good idea...
> Cheers
> Alain
>
>> I suggest to make
>> that a standard widget so that other tools outside of OB can take
>> advantage too.
>>
>> It is simple subclass of DialogWindow morph from Polymorph and can be
>> fully configured and opened for example like this:
>>
>>    OBCompletionRequest new
>>        prompt: 'Find Class';
>>        searchBlock: [ :string | self findClassIn: target environment
>> pattern: string ];
>>        labelBlock: [ :class | class name ];
>>        iconBlock: [ :class | class browserIcon ];
>>        signal
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>>
>>
>
>

>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
>
> > Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two thousands in bad written english)
> >
> > Imho it should look like this, without the static list and with recently used on top  :)
>
> why because I most of the time look for something that I already browsed.
>
>
>

>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two thousands in bad written english)
>>>
>>> Imho it should look like this, without the static list and with recently used on top  :)
>> why because I most of the time look for something that I already browsed.
>>
>>
>>
>
>

> Le 25/11/2010 22:08, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>> On Nov 25, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
>>
>>> WITH recently used on top
>> Ok I see :)
> yes but you have to enter some text to see the list...
> so, Lukas's dialog is better for such a fonctionality
>
>>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse<[hidden email]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, as ppl use to say a picture is worth a thousand words (or two thousands in bad written english)
>>>>
>>>> Imho it should look like this, without the static list and with recently used on top  :)
>>> why because I most of the time look for something that I already browsed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>