Issue 3474 in pharo: BmpReadWriterPlugin primitives should be used

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Issue 3474 in pharo: BmpReadWriterPlugin primitives should be used

pharo
Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Squeak

New issue 3474 by [hidden email]: BmpReadWriterPlugin primitives  
should be used
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3474

Andreas wrote:
"For some strange reasons the BMP read/write primitives weren't enabled.  
Probably an oversight on my behalf. The primitives improve performance by  
10-20x"

Code:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-December/156042.html

Test adoption:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-December/156043.html

Discussion:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2010-December/006199.html




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 3474 in pharo: BmpReadWriterPlugin primitives should be used

pharo
Updates:
        Labels: Milestone-1.3

Comment #1 on issue 3474 by stephane.ducasse: BmpReadWriterPlugin  
primitives should be used
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3474

Tx torsten.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 3474 in pharo: BmpReadWriterPlugin primitives should be used

pharo
Updates:
        Status: closed
        Labels: -Milestone-1.3 Milestone-1.2

Comment #2 on issue 3474 by stephane.ducasse: BmpReadWriterPlugin  
primitives should be used
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3474

in 12286 :)
funny that something so important for non academic was not working for  
years :)