Issue 3509 in pharo: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage

Status: New
Owner: ----

New issue 3509 by tony.fleig: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509

I have added multi-part MIME support to MailMessage. The package will be in  
PharoInbox as soon as I finish labeling the slice with the issue number  
assigned to this enhancement request. Included are a couple of tests for  
the new functionality.

Comment #1 on issue 3509 by tony.fleig: Multi-part MIME support for  
MailMessage
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509

Published to PharoInbox.

Updates:
        Status: Fixed
        Labels: Milestone-1.3

Comment #2 on issue 3509 by marianopeck: Multi-part MIME support for  
MailMessage
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509

excellent. thanks!  I tag it as milestone 1.3 since only important bugs are  
integrated in 1.2 ;)

Updates:
        Status: Closed

Comment #3 on issue 3509 by [hidden email]: Multi-part MIME support  
for MailMessage
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509

13002

I'm not sure but I think there was a discussion about Zinc http components and how it will be integrated into pharo. What is the status on this?

Seeing the issue report below I think there should be made some decision. Zinc has quite some good mime multipart support. No need to double efforts.
Maybe the mime parts should factored out of Zinc and should be integrated first to make up a good mime support. Http based on mime can follow.

Norbert

On 19.01.2011, at 15:49, [hidden email] wrote:

> Updates:
> Status: Closed
>
> Comment #3 on issue 3509 by [hidden email]: Multi-part MIME support for MailMessage
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3509
>
> 13002
>
>

On Jan 19, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:

> I'm not sure but I think there was a discussion about Zinc http components and how it will be integrated into pharo. What is the status on this?
>
> Seeing the issue report below I think there should be made some decision. Zinc has quite some good mime multipart support. No need to double efforts.
> Maybe the mime parts should factored out of Zinc and should be integrated first to make up a good mime support. Http based on mime can follow.
>
For this change... one step at a time. MailMessage already has mime-support, just not multi-part.

--
Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.