Issue 4684 in pharo: missing ctrl+w (methodNamesContainigIt:)

Status: New
Owner: ----

New issue 4684 by [hidden email]: missing ctrl+w  
(methodNamesContainigIt:)
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4684

In Squeak, if you selected some text and pressed ctrl+w, the  
MessageNames-Browser was opened and all methods whose name included the  
selected string were listed. This shortcut does not work anymore, only  
cmd+shift+w, which is quite difficult to type, and the search is not  
executed until you hit the search button or return.

Is there a new quick way for achieving the same?


Pharo image: Pharo
Pharo core version: Pharo1.2.2
Virtual machine used: Mac Squeak 4.2.2beta1U
Class browser used: OBSystemBrowserAdaptor



_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #1 on issue 4684 by renggli: missing ctrl+w  
(methodNamesContainigIt:)
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4684

In OB: Pressing Ctrl+m opens an implementors list, starting to type filters  
through all the subsequences of all the selectors in the system. Pressing  
enter opens a browser on the matched selectors.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: closed

Comment #2 on issue 4684 by [hidden email]: missing ctrl+w  
(methodNamesContainigIt:)
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4684

So can we close this issue.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #3 on issue 4684 by [hidden email]: missing ctrl+w  
(methodNamesContainigIt:)
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4684

This is not the same. Cmd+shift+w is more powerful because you do not need  
to type the whole message name but only part of it. See the difference?

It is ok to close the issue because cmd+shift+w does the trick, but the  
question would have been if there was a better way of achieving the same,  
as cmd+shift+w looks a bit outdated as mentioned above.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #4 on issue 4684 by [hidden email]: missing ctrl+w  
(methodNamesContainigIt:)
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4684

The other thing is that nobody known cmd-shit-w (which explains why it's  
broken).

We really need to define the feature set that we support. Its kind of hard  
to not break features never used.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #5 on issue 4684 by [hidden email]: missing ctrl+w  
(methodNamesContainigIt:)
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4684

In pharo 1.1 it worked better than in 1.2/1.3 because the search is  
executed immediately

1. select part of a message name
2. hit cmd+shift+w
3. the methodNamesContainingIt browser opens
4. 1.1 (expected): the result list is shown // 1.2: you need to hit enter


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker