Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email] New issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 From Eliot: yes please send it. How do you determine ancestry? Here's the phrase: ChangeSet directAncestryOfVersions: (ChangeSet scanVersionsOf: method class: self meta: self isMeta category: category selector: selector) the scanVersionsOf: is standard, and then I added directAncestryOfVersions: to filter appropriately. Find attached. You'll need to understand it, test it and integrate it, but it worked fine for me. I haven't had time or occasion to push it to Squeak trunk. But if people like it I'll think about doing so. I agree with Henrik that this is a useful default. I love method versions, and noise is noise, so this is having one's cake and eating it too :) Attachments: condenseChanges.st 9.3 KB _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: ReviewNeeded Cc: [hidden email] Comment #1 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Labels: Type-Feature Milestone-1.4 Comment #2 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixReviewNeeded Comment #3 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixToInclude Comment #4 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 After reading the code. It seems ok, that can be problematic to integrate (one method seems be used in the FileIn process). But one by one the method is correctly integrated, and the test on class success. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #5 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 I think we should test it really well... doing a condense changes and check integrity of the result. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: Workneeded Comment #6 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 -> Chageset contaims CObject change -> When I do "Smalltalk condenseChanges", I get a DNU SourceFiles readOnlyCopyAt: _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #7 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 fix, checked seems ok. Attachments: condenseChanges.st 7.4 KB _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #8 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 #readOnlyCopyAt: is not fixed _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #9 on issue 4843 by [hidden email]: Alternative Condense changes: prune unvisible http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4843 Issue 5379 has been merged into this issue. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |