Issue 5112 in pharo: More concistent SharedPool protocol

Status: Accepted
Owner: marianopeck

New issue 5112 by marianopeck: More concistent SharedPool protocol
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5112

unify  #usesPoolVarNamed: and #usesLocalPoolVarNamed:.
Deprecate: #hasPoolVarNamed:

Adapt also the tests....


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: FixToInclude
        Labels: Milestone-1.4

Comment #1 on issue 5112 by marianopeck: More concistent SharedPool protocol
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5112

Name:  
SLICE-Issue-5112-More-concistent-SharedPool-protocol-MarianoMartinezPeck.1
Author: MarianoMartinezPeck
Time: 16 December 2011, 3:10:42 pm
UUID: 4fe42129-cee4-462d-8b4b-ddfdd651c090
Ancestors:
Dependencies: Kernel-MarianoMartinezPeck.984,  
KernelTests-MarianoMartinezPeck.377

Fix


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Closed

Comment #2 on issue 5112 by [hidden email]: More concistent  
SharedPool protocol
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5112

in 14264


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #3 on issue 5112 by [hidden email]: More concistent  
SharedPool protocol
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5112

When you deprecate an important, please call the corresponding method. I  
did it.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #4 on issue 5112 by marianopeck: More concistent SharedPool protocol
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5112

Ahhh I didn't know that Stef. Thanks and sorry :)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #5 on issue 5112 by [hidden email]: More concistent  
SharedPool protocol
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5112

No problem :)
Thanks for the work.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker