Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email] Labels: Type-Bug New issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 #selectionForDoitAsStream uses the old ReadStream on:from:to: Such stream starts at position given by the second parameter (from:) minus one. This enables Compiler to mark token positions relative to the beginning of Text, rather than relative to the beginning of selection being evaluated. This old hack was used in Squeak. SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: on the other hand comes from Cuis and expects an offset given from the beginning of sub-selection, thus syntax errors are reported at wrong place when evaluating a sub-selection in a Text. When accepting a text with a sub-selection in the browser I can observe that syntax errors are not reported at the right location due to SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in:, so the error is not only when evaluating sub-selection, I think this method is wrong. I suggest reverting SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: like I did in Squeak and like Juan did in Cuis. Then if we really want to get rid of of ReadStream on:from:to:, we should then remove selectionForDoitAsStream and replace senders with selectionAsStream. One idea to have correct location of token would be to initialize requestorOffset with requestor editor startIndex - 1 I think the other places in the Compiler interacting with the requestor selectionInterval and token positions would work. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixReviewNeeded Comment #1 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 Hehe, this seems to work indeed, but that's many method to change just to pass the sourceOffset information... Name: SLICE-Issue-5406-SmalltalkEditornotifyatin-and-SmalltalkEditorselectionForDoitAsStream-not-in-sync-nice.1 Dependencies: CompilerTests-nice.105, System-Text-nice.199, Compiler-nice.321 This is a two fold change 1) correct SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: which incorrectly add an offset corresponding to sub-selection position This is done elsewhere, and this has not to be done when accepting the whole text (whatever the sub-selection) 2) get rid of ReadStream>>on:from:to: which is hackish (squeakish) way of taking sub-selection offset into account when interacting with text The hack is clever, but makes Squeak Stream hardly replaceable, and some features of such stream highly questionable. Use the already existing requestorOffset to pass this information. As the compiler message chain is long, we have to add another parameter (sourceOffset) to a bunch of messages, which is quite heavy... _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-1.4 Comment #2 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #3 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 Thanks! _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #4 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 I read the code and I should reread it to understand :) Now I'm too tired. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-1.4 Milestone-1.5 Comment #5 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 I moved it to 1.5 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
In reply to this post by pharo
Updates:
Status: FixToInclude Comment #7 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 I could reproduce the issue, and the fix works. I had to build the slice again since it overlapped with some already integrated stuff. Name: SLICE-Issue-5406-SmalltalkEditornotifyatin-and-SmalltalkEditorselectionForDoitAsStream-not-in-sync-GuillermoPolito.1 Author: GuillermoPolito Time: 27 April 2012, 3:02:32.434 pm UUID: f5f158d8-28fa-40e6-b088-2c576f29c626 Ancestors: Dependencies: System-Text-GuillermoPolito.200, Compiler-GuillermoPolito.324, CompilerTests-GuillermoPolito.105 repackage it _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: Integrated Comment #8 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 in 2.0 022 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixToInclude Comment #9 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 not yet.. got some error when integrating with many others together. Will do it alone. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #10 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 Alone loading works fine. What we plan to do in 2.0 is to revise the compiler API to use a context object to pass all the needed information. So the additional parameter does not scare me, it will be part of the context later. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #11 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 I could not merge in Pharo20. looking for System-Text-StephaneDucasse.198 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #12 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 Marcus can you integrate this slice because there are some changes related to your cleaning of tempNames. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #13 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 Ok I was loaded the first one instead of the second two. But still I get 4 conflicts. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
In reply to this post by pharo
Comment #16 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 Argh I did not see that we could integrate this change some time ago and now I have 11 conflicts. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Labels: sprintChile Comment #17 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 So what do we do? _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
In reply to this post by pharo
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-2.0 Milestone-3.0 Comment #19 on issue 5406 by [hidden email]: SmalltalkEditor>>notify:at:in: and SmalltalkEditor>>selectionForDoitAsStream not in sync http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5406 I think we move this to 3.0... there will be a lot of compiler related changed related to the Opal preview. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |