Issue 5442 in pharo: FSFilesystem should continue to provide onDisk and inMemory

Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
CC: [hidden email]
Labels: Milestone-1.4 Type-Cleanup

New issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should continue to  
provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442

The FSFilesystem class>>onDisk and FSFilesystem class>>inMemory methods  
were renamed to disk and memory in the fork present in 1.4.

This breaks compatibility with users of the original version of  
FSFilesystem.

We should introduce the onDisk and inMemory at least for compatibility  
reasons.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Workneeded

Comment #1 on issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should  
continue to provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442

code needed


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: FixReviewNeeded

Comment #2 on issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should  
continue to provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442

In Inbox

Name:  
SLICE-Issue-5442-FSFilesystem-should-continue-to-provide-onDisk-and-inMemory-TudorGirba.1
Author: TudorGirba
Time: 7 March 2012, 2:21:34 pm
UUID: 21479c41-7516-d043-82cc-c0033617e001
Ancestors:
Dependencies: FS-Memory-TudorGirba.8, FS-Disk-TudorGirba.12

provided onDisk and inMemory wrapper methods.

However, the cleaner solution would still be to maintain the compatibility  
with the original implementation. These methods are part of the public  
interface, and the original method names were perfectly legitimate.  
Changing them seems like an unnecessary fork that will cause headaches  
later.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: FixToInclude

Comment #3 on issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should  
continue to provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442

(No comment was entered for this change.)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Integrated

Comment #4 on issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should  
continue to provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442

in 14385


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: FixToInclude

Comment #5 on issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should  
continue to provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442#c5

This Issue has been checked by Ulysse the Monkey


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Integrated

Comment #6 on issue 5442 by [hidden email]: FSFilesystem should  
continue to provide onDisk and inMemory
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5442#c6

Integrated in Pharo1.4 385

Thanks


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker