Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email] Labels: Milestone-1.4 Type-Bug Difficulty-Easy New issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 The new implementation of union: and intersection: refer directly to the class of the current collection. Instead, they should use species. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixToInclude Comment #1 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 Slice created in the inbox. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #2 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 Name: SLICE-Issue-5523-Collection-union-and-intersection-should-use-species-TudorGirba.1 Author: TudorGirba Time: 20 March 2012, 7:25:55 am UUID: b3944736-b2d8-4c30-ad24-3c39c2a18cf9 Ancestors: Dependencies: Collections-Abstract-TudorGirba.158 use species instead of class for Collection>>union: and intersection: _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: Integrated Comment #3 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 in 14404 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: Workneeded Comment #4 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 Nope, not integrated. The attached Slice removes groupedBy: and #includesAll: and sum: from Collection. Was that intended? _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #5 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 Oops, too rushed. My bad. I will create another one. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #6 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 Actually, the issue raised from Moose having these as extensions because they were missing before. The problem is that I cannot quite see these overrides. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #7 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 The rule is: never do a Slice from an image that is not the 1.4 image... any loaded package (any) will just end up making trouble. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #8 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 Got it. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #9 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 I created another slice. This time, it also fixes difference: Name: SLICE-Issue-5523--Collection-union-and-intersection-should-use-species-TudorGirba.2 Author: TudorGirba Time: 20 March 2012, 9:10:04 am UUID: 1a348d52-f9bc-784f-a95f-c51baae1a94b Ancestors: Dependencies: Collections-Abstract-TudorGirba.159 only publish class->species change to: - union: - intersection: - difference: _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixToInclude Comment #10 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: Integrated Comment #11 on issue 5523 by [hidden email]: Collection union: and intersection: should use species http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5523 in 14405 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |