Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type

moose-technology
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix Milestone-4.4

New issue 584 by [hidden email]: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX  
Type
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584

AnnotationType should be a Type.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type

moose-technology
Updates:
        Status: Fixed
        Owner: [hidden email]
        Cc: [hidden email]

Comment #1 on issue 584 by [hidden email]: AnnotationType should be  
a FAMIX Type
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584

Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51
Author: TudorGirba
Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am
UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506
Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50

AnnotationType is now subclass of Type
AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute


http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584

http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type

Nicolas Anquetil

Hi,

I am not seeing the change in the latest moose-dev

(same for AnnotationTypeAttribute)

nicolas

----- Mail original -----

> De: [hidden email]
> À: [hidden email]
> Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 11:56:01
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type
> Updates:
> Status: Fixed
> Owner: [hidden email]
> Cc: [hidden email]
>
> Comment #1 on issue 584 by [hidden email]: AnnotationType
> should be
> a FAMIX Type
> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
>
> Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51
> Author: TudorGirba
> Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am
> UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506
> Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
>
> AnnotationType is now subclass of Type
> AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
>
>
> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
>
> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type

Tudor Girba
Hi,

I have just downloaded the latest image and AnnotationType is a subclass of Type and AnnotationTypeAttribute is a subclass of Attribute:
http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/moose/*zip*/moose.zip

Cheers,
Doru



On 13 Apr 2011, at 08:48, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I am not seeing the change in the latest moose-dev
>
> (same for AnnotationTypeAttribute)
>
> nicolas
>
> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: [hidden email]
>> À: [hidden email]
>> Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 11:56:01
>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type
>> Updates:
>> Status: Fixed
>> Owner: [hidden email]
>> Cc: [hidden email]
>>
>> Comment #1 on issue 584 by [hidden email]: AnnotationType
>> should be
>> a FAMIX Type
>> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
>>
>> Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51
>> Author: TudorGirba
>> Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am
>> UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506
>> Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
>>
>> AnnotationType is now subclass of Type
>> AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
>>
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"What we can governs what we wish."




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type

Nicolas Anquetil
Right!

really sorry, too much versions downloaded, I was looking at the wrong file

I see that you finally opted for AnnotationTypeAttribute as an Attribute and not merely a StructuralEntity ...

nicolas

----- Mail original -----

> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]>
> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]>
> Envoyé: Mercredi 13 Avril 2011 09:14:13
> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology: AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type
> Hi,
>
> I have just downloaded the latest image and AnnotationType is a
> subclass of Type and AnnotationTypeAttribute is a subclass of
> Attribute:
> http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/moose/*zip*/moose.zip
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
> On 13 Apr 2011, at 08:48, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am not seeing the change in the latest moose-dev
> >
> > (same for AnnotationTypeAttribute)
> >
> > nicolas
> >
> > ----- Mail original -----
> >> De: [hidden email]
> >> À: [hidden email]
> >> Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 11:56:01
> >> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 584 in moose-technology:
> >> AnnotationType should be a FAMIX Type
> >> Updates:
> >> Status: Fixed
> >> Owner: [hidden email]
> >> Cc: [hidden email]
> >>
> >> Comment #1 on issue 584 by [hidden email]: AnnotationType
> >> should be
> >> a FAMIX Type
> >> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
> >>
> >> Name: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.51
> >> Author: TudorGirba
> >> Time: 12 April 2011, 11:54:51 am
> >> UUID: ae3fc077-5341-458e-8ec1-c7055e6f3506
> >> Ancestors: Famix-Java-TudorGirba.50
> >>
> >> AnnotationType is now subclass of Type
> >> AnnotationTypeAttribute is now subclass of Attribute
> >>
> >>
> >> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=584
> >>
> >> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=585
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Moose-dev mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "What we can governs what we wish."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev