Issue 620 in moose-technology: RPackageOrganizer should have a better public API for unregistering package

Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
CC: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium RPackage

New issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should have a  
better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

in particular one that assembles all the elementary steps
   - unregister back pointer (class mapping)
   - unregister class extension mapping


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Labels: -RPackage component-rpa

Comment #1 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

(No comment was entered for this change.)

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Labels: -component-rpa Component-RPackage

Comment #2 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

(No comment was entered for this change.)

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Comment #3 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

I believe this is fixed now, right?

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Status: closed

Comment #4 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

yes we did it

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Status: Fixed
        Labels: Milestone-4.6

Comment #5 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

(No comment was entered for this change.)

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Status: closed

Comment #6 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

yes we did it.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Status: Fixed

Comment #7 on issue 620 by [hidden email]: RPackageOrganizer should  
have a better public API for unregistering package
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=620

(No comment was entered for this change.)

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev