Issue 6260 in pharo: Monticello cache location should be configurable

Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Bug Milestone-2.0

New issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache location should be  
configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260

Pharo2.0a Latest update: #20181

Currently it always points to "package-cache" relative to
the image location.

If you want to share the package cache between two
or more images it would be good to easily set up
the common path.



_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: FixReviewNeeded

Comment #1 on issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache location  
should be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260

Name:  
SLICE-Issue-6260-Monticello-cache-location-should-be-configurable-tbn.1
Author: tbn
Time: 4 July 2012, 4:00:33.577 pm
UUID: 90d46a58-cf93-7841-9a94-d1ec4e7b6876
Ancestors:
Dependencies: Monticello-tbn.623, Settings-Monticello-tbn.5

- refactor #default and #default: in MCCacheRepository due to different  
semantics
- allow cache repository to be set using the Settings tool (Settings ->  
Metacello -> Local cache directory)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: MonkeyIsChecking

Comment #2 on issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache  
location should be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260#c2

The Monkey is currently checking this issue. Please don't change it!


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: WorkNeeded

Comment #3 on issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache  
location should be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260#c3

Monkey went bananas:
--------------------
Error while loading  
SLICE-Issue-6260-Monticello-cache-location-should-be-configurable-tbn.1  
from http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/PharoInbox:
        MCMergeOrLoadWarning: You are about to load new versions of the following  
packages
that have unsaved changes in the image:

   Monticello
   Monticello

If you continue, you will lose these changes:
  1: MCVersionLoader>>warnAboutLosingChangesTo:ifCancel:ifMerge:
  2: MCVersionLoader>>checkForModificationsIfCancel:ifMerge:
  3: MCVersionLoader>>loadWithNameLike:
  4: MCVersionLoader>>load
  5: GoferLoad>>execute
  6: Gofer>>execute:do:
  7: Gofer>>execute:
  8: Gofer>>load
  9: GoferResolvedReference>>load
10: [self slice load] in UlysseTheMonkey>>loadSlice
        ...Test Results:
-------------
Passed: 6446
        CollectionsTests-Arrayed (547)
        CollectionsTests-Atomic (12)
        CollectionsTests-Sequenceable (907)
        CollectionsTests-SplitJoin (27)
        CollectionsTests-Stack (16)
        CollectionsTests-Streams (37)
        CollectionsTests-Strings (596)
        CollectionsTests-Support (12)
        CollectionsTests-Unordered (1951)
        CollectionsTests-Weak (739)
        CompilerTests (179)
        KernelTests-Chronology (577)
        KernelTests-Classes (67)
        KernelTests-Exception (2)
        KernelTests-Methods (178)
        KernelTests-Numbers (276)
        KernelTests-Objects (86)
        KernelTests-Pragmas (3)
        KernelTests-Processes (31)
        SUnit-Core-Extensions (3)
        SUnit-Core-Utilities (3)
        SUnit-Tests-Core (78)
        Tests-Monticello (119)

Errors: 1
        MCDirectoryRepositoryTest>>#testAddAndLoad


----------------------------------------------------------
Loaded Source:  
SLICE-Issue-6260-Monticello-cache-location-should-be-configurable-tbn.1  
from http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/PharoInbox
Tested using Pharo-2.0-20181-a on CoInterpreter  
VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.161 uuid:  
8e0c22c3-b48d-4d8d-a7f9-8a75dc246f28 Jul  3 2012,  
StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.161 uuid:  
8e0c22c3-b48d-4d8d-a7f9-8a75dc246f28 Jul  3 2012,  
https://git.gitorious.org/cogvm/blessed.git Commit:  
8028952c1242f72b6d078b8161f310e3bf0cd365 Date: Tue Jul 3 16:26:14 2012  
+0200 By: Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #4 on issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache location  
should be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260

Dear monkey: MCDirectoryRepositoryTest>>#testAddAndLoad was already red  
without this change.

But thanks for your info ;)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #5 on issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache location  
should be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260

Banana problem, see

http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2012-July/067134.html


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Integrated

Comment #6 on issue 6260 by [hidden email]: Monticello cache  
location should be configurable
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6260

in 2.0 185


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker