Status: Accepted
Owner: marianopeck CC: [hidden email], [hidden email], [hidden email] Labels: Type-Bug Milestone-2.0 New issue 6523 by marianopeck: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 hi. It says: systemSubPackages "return all RPackages matching with systemCategories of this RPackage" |tmpPackages| tmpPackages := OrderedCollection new. self systemCategories do: [:aString | (aString asSymbol = self name) ifFalse: [ |tmpPackage| "Maybe a RPackage matching the subcategory name does not yet exist in the organizer (Because packageInfo lazily register category from system). In this case, We should also lazily register a new RPackage with the right contents inside:" tmpPackage := self organizer packageNamed: aString asSymbol ifAbsent: [self organizer importFromPackageInfo: (PackageInfo named: aString)]. tmpPackages add: (tmpPackage). ]. ]. ^ tmpPackages but when it does "self organizer default" should be "self organizer" slice coming _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixReviewNeeded Comment #1 on issue 6523 by marianopeck: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 Fix in inbox Name: SLICE-Issue-6523-Bug-in-RPackage-systemSubPackages-MarianoMartinezPeck.1 Author: MarianoMartinezPeck Time: 4 August 2012, 6:03:07.444 pm UUID: 4139a5c9-f571-42b3-87ef-2f71e3b2e1fe Ancestors: Dependencies: RPackage-Core-MarianoMartinezPeck.151 Fix to issue 6523 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: MonkeyIsChecking Comment #2 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523#c2 The Monkey is currently checking this issue. Please don't change it! _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: ValidatedByTheMonkey Labels: CheckedIn20244 Comment #3 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523#c3 This Issue has been checked by Ulysse the Monkey 6332 tests passed in 00:01:28s: =============================== CollectionsTests-Arrayed (547) CollectionsTests-Atomic (12) CollectionsTests-Sequenceable (906) CollectionsTests-SplitJoin (27) CollectionsTests-Stack (16) CollectionsTests-Streams (37) CollectionsTests-Strings (596) CollectionsTests-Support (12) CollectionsTests-Unordered (1951) CollectionsTests-Weak (739) CompilerTests (179) KernelTests-Chronology (583) KernelTests-Classes (67) KernelTests-Exception (2) KernelTests-Methods (178) KernelTests-Numbers (276) KernelTests-Objects (86) KernelTests-Pragmas (3) KernelTests-Processes (31) SUnit-Core-Extensions (3) SUnit-Core-Utilities (3) SUnit-Tests-Core (78) ---------------------------------------------------------- Loaded Source: SLICE-Issue-6523-Bug-in-RPackage-systemSubPackages-MarianoMartinezPeck.1 from http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/PharoInbox Tested using Pharo-2.0-20244-a on CoInterpreter VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.162 uuid: e4554f9a-cc90-4826-a807-ac282b782fe4 Aug 3 2012 StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.162 uuid: e4554f9a-cc90-4826-a807-ac282b782fe4 Aug 3 2012 git://gitorious.org/cogvm/blessed.git Commit: aeb0705cde4b8fc57cb262dc051c5ee6dfa72a14 Date: 2012-07-26 16:38:48 +0200 By: Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: FixToInclude Comment #4 on issue 6523 by marianopeck: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #5 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 berk what is subsystemPackages? Who call that? We should kill that there is no such thing as subsystemPackages _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #6 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 Mariano nobody should use this method and everything in the compatibility layer should get killed allDefinedClasses allMethodReferences have no senders so we should get rid of them. _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #7 on issue 6523 by marianopeck: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 I am using both of them #allDefinedClasses #allMethodReferences for Tanker (both for kernel reconstruction and for Seaside export/import). If you remove that, the only way is to use PackageInfo. And we don't want that, right? _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #8 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 I believe that for tanker you should specify the exact package names... _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #9 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 Again let me repeat it: can we think in terms of layers? You should not rely on MC layer for fuel. Use PackageInfo for now and be ready to migrate to RPackage. MC will be building MCPackage based on RPackage. Is it clear? Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Comment #10 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 ok, I will integrate this, just because is there... Mariano, pls check stefs recommendations. As I said, you need to stop thinking on terms of X-A, X-B. X-C and start thinking on X (with tags A, B, C). _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Updates:
Status: Integrated Comment #11 on issue 6523 by [hidden email]: Bug in RPackage >> systemSubPackages http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6523 in 20245 _______________________________________________ Pharo-bugtracker mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |