Issue 7030 in pharo: Packages are a mess in Nautilus

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Issue 7030 in pharo: Packages are a mess in Nautilus

pharo
Status: Accepted
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-Bug Milestone-2.0

New issue 7030 by [hidden email]: Packages are a mess in Nautilus
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7030

- I don't understand the icons. There are boxes empty and full, there is  
yellow M.
What do they mean?

- There are *a lot* of tiny packages. Do we really need to split Graphics  
in 5 packages?

- There are *a lot* of empty packages

- There are a lot of packages with names that make not clear to which part  
of the system they
belong.

- There are lots of packages that should be merged into other packages.  
e.f. RecentSubmissions
is clearly a tool.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 7030 in pharo: Packages are a mess in Nautilus

pharo

Comment #1 on issue 7030 by [hidden email]: Packages are a mess in  
Nautilus
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7030

But marcus we should not change that now.  Esteban will rewrite nautilus in  
spec.
Do not stress on that topic.


- There are lots of packages that should be merged into other packages.  
e.f. RecentSubmissions
is clearly a tool.
>> so it is a problem not to have it in Tools something?


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker