Issue 7144 in pharo: CI test run of 2.0 completely broken

Status: HorribleErrorBlockingE…erything
Owner: [hidden email]
Labels: Type-FailingTest Milestone-2.0 Importance-High

New issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0 completely  
broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

... all test runs are not working. All three architectures are dead

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo-2.0/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/

_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #1 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0  
completely broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

probably the changeset bug
let me fix it first :)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #2 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0  
completely broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

No, this is the new ci server and they are all broken.




_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #3 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0  
completely broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

This should give some clues why it is broken:

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo-2.0/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/label=mac/16/consoleFull


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #4 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0  
completely broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

The

   setsockopt: No buffer space available

comes from ZnNetworkingUtils class>>#setServerSocketOptions: but it has  
been like that forever. Maybe the code could be removed, but I don't think  
it causes trouble

In the beginning of the week I was building images starting from #20438 and  
I saw something similar, related to Delays and clock/timing, crashing, but  
it went away the second time I ran the build...


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #5 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0 completely  
broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

This is how it crashed for me today


Segmentation fault Thu Dec 20 10:49:41 2012


Squeak VM version: 3.9-7 #1 Fri Sep 28 22:36:13 CEST 2012 gcc 4.1.2
Built from: CoInterpreter VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.164 uuid:  
d77dee73-00f5-4d00-847b-00646b08329d Sep 28 2012
With: StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.164 uuid:  
d77dee73-00f5-4d00-847b-00646b08329d Sep 28 2012
Revision: https://git.gitorious.org/cogvm/blessed.git Commit:  
bfc9fe2c4abcd2972c8bd9eac1c77f9baaf23e8a Date: 2012-09-25 13:34:47 +0200  
By: Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>
Build host: Linux pharo-build.lille.inria.fr 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5xen #1 SMP  
Tue Nov 9 14:13:46 EST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
plugin path: /home/ubuntu/smalltalk/bin/ [default:  
/home/ubuntu/smalltalk/bin/]


C stack backtrace:
../bin/CogVM[0x80976d1]
../bin/CogVM[0x8097872]
[0xb779440c]
[0xaebecbe1]
../bin/CogVM[0x80918f4]
../bin/CogVM(main+0x38a)[0x809856a]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/tls/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0xb75ac4d3]


Smalltalk stack dump:
0xbfc99a68 M LargePositiveInteger(Number)>fractionPart -1326252404: a(n)  
LargePositiveInteger
0xbfc99a88 M Duration class>seconds:nanoSeconds: -1359772332: a(n) Duration  
class
0xbfc99aa8 M Duration class>days: -1359772332: a(n) Duration class
0xbfc99ac4 M SmallInteger(Number)>days 4830773=2415386
0xbfc99ae4 M DateAndTime class>julianDayNumber: -1359772540: a(n)  
DateAndTime class
0xbfc99b00 M DateAndTime class>epoch -1359772540: a(n) DateAndTime class
0xbfc99b1c M DateAndTime>asSeconds -1326254344: a(n) DateAndTime
0xbfc99b40 M DateAndTime>< -1326254344: a(n) DateAndTime
0xbfc99b5c M DateAndTime(Magnitude)>> -1326274036: a(n) DateAndTime
0xbfc99b78 M DateAndTime(Magnitude)><= -1326274036: a(n) DateAndTime
0xbfc99b9c M NOCEntryList>addEntry:date: -1331695280: a(n) NOCEntryList
0xbfc99bc4 M [] in NOCCompletionTable>addEntry:date: -1331696904: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable
0xbfc99be4 M OrderedCollection>do: -1326253080: a(n) OrderedCollection
0xbfc99c04 M NOCCompletionTable>addEntry:date: -1331696904: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable
0xbfc99c28 M NOCCompletionTable>compiled:in:date: -1331696904: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable
0xbfc99c50 M NOCCompletionTable>justCompiled:in: -1331696904: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable
0xbfc99c74 M [] in NOCCompletionTable>quickFillWithClass: -1331696904: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable
0xbfc99c9c M MethodDictionary>valuesDo: -1328328844: a(n) MethodDictionary
0xbfc99cb8 M ConfigurationOfXMLWriter class(Behavior)>methodsDo:  
-1328328908: a(n) ConfigurationOfXMLWriter class
0xbfc99cd4 M NOCCompletionTable>quickFillWithClass: -1331696904: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable
0xbfc99cf0 M NOCCompletionTable class>methodChanged: -1356110100: a(n)  
NOCCompletionTable class
0xbfc99d0c M MessageSend>value: -1343787156: a(n) MessageSend
0xbfc99d28 M MessageSend>cull: -1343787156: a(n) MessageSend
0xbfc99d44 M MessageSend>cull:cull: -1343787156: a(n) MessageSend
0xbfc99d68 M [] in AnnouncementSubscription>deliver: -1343787136: a(n)  
AnnouncementSubscription
0xbfc99d84 M BlockClosure>on:do: -1326382092: a(n) BlockClosure
0xbfc99da4 M BlockClosure>on:fork: -1326382092: a(n) BlockClosure
0xbfc99dc4 M AnnouncementSubscription>deliver: -1343787136: a(n)  
AnnouncementSubscription
0xbfc99de8 M [] in SubscriptionRegistry>deliver:to:startingAt: -1355905484:  
a(n) SubscriptionRegistry
0xbfc99e08 M BlockClosure>ifCurtailed: -1326382460: a(n) BlockClosure
0xbfc99e30 M SubscriptionRegistry>deliver:to:startingAt: -1355905484: a(n)  
SubscriptionRegistry
0xbfc99e54 M SubscriptionRegistry>deliver:to: -1355905484: a(n)  
SubscriptionRegistry
0xbfc99e78 M SubscriptionRegistry>deliver: -1355905484: a(n)  
SubscriptionRegistry
0xbfc99e98 M SystemAnnouncer(Announcer)>announce: -1355905504: a(n)  
SystemAnnouncer
0xbfc99eb4 M SystemAnnouncer>announce: -1355905504: a(n) SystemAnnouncer
0xbfc99ed0 M  
SystemAnnouncer>methodAdded:selector:inProtocol:class:requestor:  
-1355905504: a(n) SystemAnnouncer
0xbfc99efc M MethodAddition>notifyObservers -1328189152: a(n) MethodAddition



_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #6 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0  
completely broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

yes, but look below.. there is a memory overflow.
but crash with delays seems like something else.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Closed

Comment #7 on issue 7144 by [hidden email]: CI test run of 2.0  
completely broken
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7144

Same problem as with Opal build: .sources download failed and image hang  
due to that.
I now download the sources.

Linux build ran now, Mac us running, win is red due to other reason

So we can close this issue


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker