Status: New
Owner: ---- CC: [hidden email] Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 public abstract class A { ... } should appear as ( (FAMIX.Class (name 'A') (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') ) Similar things should happen to methods and attributes. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
It seems this part needs some cleaning up. why should we have (isAbstract true) (isPublic true) and (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') nicolas ----- Mail original ----- > De: [hidden email] > À: [hidden email] > Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 > Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers > Status: New > Owner: ---- > CC: [hidden email] > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ > > New issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export > modifiers > http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 > > public abstract class A { ... } > > should appear as > > ( > (FAMIX.Class > (name 'A') > (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') > ) > > Similar things should happen to methods and attributes. > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
We should not.
Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') Cheers, Doru On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote: > > It seems this part needs some cleaning up. > > why should we have > > (isAbstract true) > (isPublic true) > and > (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') > > > > nicolas > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: [hidden email] >> À: [hidden email] >> Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 >> Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers >> Status: New >> Owner: ---- >> CC: [hidden email] >> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ >> >> New issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export >> modifiers >> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 >> >> public abstract class A { ... } >> >> should appear as >> >> ( >> (FAMIX.Class >> (name 'A') >> (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') >> ) >> >> Similar things should happen to methods and attributes. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, one might have better chances to win by moving slower." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
good I guess same thing goes for private and protected and final ? nicolas ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]> > À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]> > Envoyé: Vendredi 28 Octobre 2011 20:54:30 > Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers > We should not. > > Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote: > > > > > It seems this part needs some cleaning up. > > > > why should we have > > > > (isAbstract true) > > (isPublic true) > > and > > (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') > > > > > > > > nicolas > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > >> De: [hidden email] > >> À: [hidden email] > >> Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 > >> Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does > >> not export modifiers > >> Status: New > >> Owner: ---- > >> CC: [hidden email] > >> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ > >> > >> New issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export > >> modifiers > >> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 > >> > >> public abstract class A { ... } > >> > >> should appear as > >> > >> ( > >> (FAMIX.Class > >> (name 'A') > >> (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') > >> ) > >> > >> Similar things should happen to methods and attributes. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Moose-dev mailing list > >> [hidden email] > >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Moose-dev mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, > one might have better chances to win by moving slower." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Yes. And package.
Doru On 29 Oct 2011, at 09:47, Nicolas Anquetil wrote: > > good > > I guess same thing goes for private and protected > > and final ? > > nicolas > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Tudor Girba" <[hidden email]> >> À: "Moose-related development" <[hidden email]> >> Envoyé: Vendredi 28 Octobre 2011 20:54:30 >> Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export modifiers >> We should not. >> >> Only: (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> On 28 Oct 2011, at 17:42, Nicolas Anquetil wrote: >> >>> >>> It seems this part needs some cleaning up. >>> >>> why should we have >>> >>> (isAbstract true) >>> (isPublic true) >>> and >>> (modifiers 'abstract' 'public') >>> >>> >>> >>> nicolas >>> >>> ----- Mail original ----- >>>> De: [hidden email] >>>> À: [hidden email] >>>> Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 09:34:43 >>>> Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 733 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does >>>> not export modifiers >>>> Status: New >>>> Owner: ---- >>>> CC: [hidden email] >>>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ >>>> >>>> New issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export >>>> modifiers >>>> http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 >>>> >>>> public abstract class A { ... } >>>> >>>> should appear as >>>> >>>> ( >>>> (FAMIX.Class >>>> (name 'A') >>>> (modifiers 'public' 'abstract') >>>> ) >>>> >>>> Similar things should happen to methods and attributes. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, >> one might have better chances to win by moving slower." >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by moose-technology
Updates:
Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 (No comment was entered for this change.) _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-4.6 Comment #2 on issue 733 by [hidden email]: VerveineJ does not export modifiers http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=733 Excellent. I just tested and it works. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
I believe that now we should update the accessor methods in FAMIXNamedEntity such as isPublic, isPrivate, etc, since now we have in modifiers, for example:
"public" instead of "isPublic". So now if I call #isPublic for a public method I will have false. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:36 AM, <[hidden email]> wrote: Updates: -- Andre Hora _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
It's already done. Just update. Doru
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |