Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
28 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology

Comment #19 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

It is!

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology
Updates:
        Status: New
        Labels: -Milestone-4.7 Milestone-4.8

Comment #20 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

This bug just resurfaced: the rendering of the zOrder is broken.

If you do:

view node: 1 forIt: [view node: 11].
view node: 2 forIt: [view node: 22].
view node: 3 forIt: [view node: 33].
view edgeFromAssociation: 11->33.

You get the correct zOrder:
- nodes 1,2,3: zIndex 2
- nodes 11,22,33: zIndex 4
- edge: zIndex 3

But the rendering does not seem to take it into account anymore.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

Tudor Girba-2
Please let's look at this one. I took a look at the code, but I could not see where the problem is.

Doru


On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:30 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote:
Updates:
        Status: New
        Labels: -Milestone-4.7 Milestone-4.8

Comment #20 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

This bug just resurfaced: the rendering of the zOrder is broken.

If you do:


view node: 1 forIt: [view node: 11].
view node: 2 forIt: [view node: 22].
view node: 3 forIt: [view node: 33].
view edgeFromAssociation: 11->33.

You get the correct zOrder:

- nodes 1,2,3: zIndex 2
- nodes 11,22,33: zIndex 4
- edge: zIndex 3

But the rendering does not seem to take it into account anymore.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology
In reply to this post by moose-technology
Updates:
        Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High

Comment #21 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

Version 1.405 of roassal fixes this. Quite subtle, related to some caching.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology
Updates:
        Status: Fixed

Comment #22 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology

Comment #23 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

Great. I tested it and it works fine!

Would it maybe possible to add a bitmap-based test to ensure that the  
rendering does not go wrong on this?

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology

Comment #24 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

testWithEdgesAndNestingWithMondrian tests against a trace of all the  
graphical primitives invoked. It does not directly tests the bitmap, but  
using ROTracingCanvas is quite effective.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 888 in moose-technology: MondrianViewBuilder should support a better zOrder

moose-technology

Comment #25 on issue 888 by [hidden email]: MondrianViewBuilder  
should support a better zOrder
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=888

That is neat!

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
12