Issue 889 in moose-technology: All meta-properties should have an MSEComment

Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-4.7 Component-Famix

New issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should have an  
MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

Here is the list of missing comments:
http://ci.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-on-moose/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/OnMooseMetaPropertiesWithoutComments/_Uncommented_meta_properties_/

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Comment #1 on issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should  
have an MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

We are making progress.

Only 14 properties left:
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXNamedEntity.annotationInstances()'  
#'Smalltalk::DudeDuplication.multiplicationInvolved()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationType.instances()'  
#'Smalltalk::MooseModel.sourceLanguage()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationInstanceAttribute.parentAnnotationInstance()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationInstanceAttribute.value()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationInstance.annotatedEntity()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXBehaviouralEntity.activations()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationType.container()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationInstance.annotationType()'  
#'Smalltalk::DudeMultiplication.duplications()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationInstance.attributes()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXAnnotationInstanceAttribute.annotationTypeAttribute()'  
#'Smalltalk::FAMIXSourceAnchor.element()'

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Comment #2 on issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should  
have an MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

I made all of them today and commit them. So the issue is fixed. You can of  
course check what I have done. I don't have the right to say that the issue  
is fixed.

Anne

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Comment #3 on issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should  
have an MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

I checked, and the 14 properties are still not yet commented :).

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Comment #4 on issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should  
have an MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

Also, please double check that you are working on the top version before  
committing. I had to merge your changes with the main branch :)

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Comment #5 on issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should  
have an MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

I took the last version from the jenkins website and some of the 14  
comments mentioned upper were already in the image. I put the ones that  
were missing. Normally, all the comments of the issue are committed.

Anne

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Updates:
        Status: Fixed

Comment #6 on issue 889 by [hidden email]: All meta-properties should  
have an MSEComment
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=889

Thanks, Anne.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev