http://www.reddit.com/r/software/comments/2zktsa/java_vs_smalltalk_cage_match/
-- Join in the conversation. The commenter provides a strong counter-argument and I don't know how to respond. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
I'll respond to this later today.
It's an interesting bet. Wish I had spare cash to make this a real competition. W Redline Smalltalk the library issue is moot - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by horrido
Well, you know, the guy is making a sensible argument. There's a lot of truth in it. Ignoring this problem of missing bindings for X means being ignorant of real life. I love Smalltalk, I prefer it over many alternatives, including Java and Javascript. But sometimes it feels like being overly religious rather than based on hard facts. There is a lot of wishful thinking to not switching to some other language.
-- So let's put it more positively: if your business domain is extremely complex and you can live without bindings for a lot of stuff, then Smalltalk is one of the best choices you can make. If you want to build something cool and modern-looking or leverage code from very C-oriented communities, it is probably easier to byte the bullet and go that route. Programming against C-APIs in Smalltalk is not fun and tool support is poor. So what do you think we should answer? Am Samstag, 21. März 2015 15:41:23 UTC+1 schrieb Richard Eng:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
I finally gave a response. It's the best I could do. What do you think?
-- On Sunday, 22 March 2015 08:07:08 UTC-4, Joachim Tuchel wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by jtuchel
> Programming against C-APIs in Smalltalk is not fun and tool support > is poor... So what do you think we should answer? How about expressing gratitude for the feedback, and diverting half the energy we would have put into a response into improving the system? :) -C -- Craig Latta netjam.org March 2015: + 1 510 480 5860 (SMS ok) +31 20 893 2796 (no SMS) afterward: +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
>> How about expressing gratitude for the feedback, and diverting half the energy we would have put into a response into improving the system? :) Any feedback is good feedback and I'm sure all those involved are grateful for the feedback. I know I am. The first step in fixing anything is acknowledging there is a problem. A fix is the next step. :) On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Craig Latta <[hidden email]> wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
In reply to this post by James Ladd
On 3/22/2015 1:28 AM, James Ladd wrote:
> I'll respond to this later today. > It's an interesting bet. Wish I had spare cash to make this a real competition. > W Redline Smalltalk the library issue is moot Does Redline have the Browser/Inspector/Debugger combo? If not I wouldn't qualify it as a Smalltalk (yet)... Either way this cage fight has been on for quite a while now and the results are known :-/ R - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Good question - yes it does have the browser/inspector etc combo
You use an IDE like intellij and the Resline plugin. All are still a work in progress. Your question raises a very important point, that Smalltalkers don't see the syntax alone as the language yet for 99.99% of other languages the user does think the language is just the syntax. To move Smalltalk forward in discussions this differentiation should be made more clear. Sent from the holodeck. > On 24 Mar 2015, at 12:19 am, Reinout Heeck <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On 3/22/2015 1:28 AM, James Ladd wrote: >> I'll respond to this later today. >> It's an interesting bet. Wish I had spare cash to make this a real competition. >> W Redline Smalltalk the library issue is moot > > > Does Redline have the Browser/Inspector/Debugger combo? > > If not I wouldn't qualify it as a Smalltalk (yet)... > > > > > Either way this cage fight has been on for quite a while now and the results are known :-/ > > > > R > - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/smalltalk-research/utQzPlyNBuc/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to [hidden email]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smalltalk Research" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |