As far as I can see, the only way to call external Javascript is by writing Javascript-Code directly into a method like so:
doSomethingWith: anObject {'return SOMELIBRARY.doSomething(anObject); '}
is this correct? The OMETA based Smalltalk->JS translator seem to let one use st-syntax for direct access to javascript like so: doSomethingWith: anObject [
SOMELIBRARY doSomething: anObject. ] and CoffeeScript can use JS seamlessly in the same way. Best regards, RD
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, |
More compilers which compile from a dynamic language to JavaScript
https://github.com/jashkenas/coffee-script/wiki/List-of-languages-that-compile-to-JS Smalltalk not mentioned yet .... --Hannes On 3/21/11, Richard Durr <[hidden email]> wrote: > As far as I can see, the only way to call external Javascript is by writing > Javascript-Code directly into a method like so: > doSomethingWith: anObject > {'return SOMELIBRARY.doSomething(anObject); '} > > is this correct? > The OMETA based Smalltalk->JS translator seem to let one use st-syntax for > direct access to javascript like so: > > doSomethingWith: anObject [ > SOMELIBRARY doSomething: anObject. > ] > > and CoffeeScript can use JS seamlessly in the same way. > > Best regards, > RD > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Nicolas Petton > <[hidden email]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to share a project I'm working on on my spare time: Jtalk >> Smalltalk. >> >> http://nicolaspetton.github.com/jtalk >> https://github.com/NicolasPetton/jtalk >> >> Jtalk is an implementation of the Smalltalk language that compiles into >> JavaScript. >> >> Some features: >> - it is written in itself (including the parser/compiler) >> - it is self-contained >> - it compiles into efficient JS code >> - it uses the Squeak chunk format >> - Pharo is considered as the reference implementation >> >> I think Jtalk can be compared to CoffeeScript[1], Objective-J[2] or >> Clamato[3], from which it reuses some ideas and code. >> >> Jtalk includes an IDE with a class browser, transcript and workspace, an >> HTML canvas similar to Seaside and a jQuery binding. >> >> It is still a young piece of code, and some important features are still >> missing/incomplete. >> >> Cheers, >> Nicolas Petton >> >> [1] http://jashkenas.github.com/coffee-script/ >> [2] http://cappuccino.org/ >> [3] http://clamato.net >> >> >> > |
In reply to this post by Richard Durr-2
Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 10:17 +0100, Richard Durr a écrit :
> As far as I can see, the only way to call external Javascript is by > writing Javascript-Code directly into a method like so: > doSomethingWith: anObject > {'return SOMELIBRARY.doSomething(anObject); '} > > > is this correct? No, you can call JS functions with: #basicPerform: and #basicPerform:withArguments: Cheers, Nicolas > The OMETA based Smalltalk->JS translator seem to let one use st-syntax > for direct access to javascript like so: > > > doSomethingWith: anObject [ > SOMELIBRARY doSomething: anObject. > ] > > > and CoffeeScript can use JS seamlessly in the same way. > > > Best regards, > RD > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Nicolas Petton > <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to share a project I'm working on on my spare > time: Jtalk > Smalltalk. > > http://nicolaspetton.github.com/jtalk > https://github.com/NicolasPetton/jtalk > > Jtalk is an implementation of the Smalltalk language that > compiles into > JavaScript. > > Some features: > - it is written in itself (including the parser/compiler) > - it is self-contained > - it compiles into efficient JS code > - it uses the Squeak chunk format > - Pharo is considered as the reference implementation > > I think Jtalk can be compared to CoffeeScript[1], > Objective-J[2] or > Clamato[3], from which it reuses some ideas and code. > > Jtalk includes an IDE with a class browser, transcript and > workspace, an > HTML canvas similar to Seaside and a jQuery binding. > > It is still a young piece of code, and some important features > are still > missing/incomplete. > > Cheers, > Nicolas Petton > > [1] http://jashkenas.github.com/coffee-script/ > [2] http://cappuccino.org/ > [3] http://clamato.net > > > > |
Is SOMELIBRARY then reachable at all?
SOMELIBRARY basicPerform: #doSomething withArguments: (Array with: anObject ), ?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Nicolas Petton <[hidden email]> wrote: Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 10:17 +0100, Richard Durr a écrit : |
Le dimanche 27 mars 2011 à 01:28 +0100, Richard Durr a écrit :
> Is SOMELIBRARY then reachable at all? > SOMELIBRARY basicPerform: #doSomething withArguments: (Array with: > anObject ), ? Not currently. The reason is that Jtalk doesn't extend Object.prototype. But as I said, Jtalk is still young, there are tons of things to do :) Cheers, Nico > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Nicolas Petton > <[hidden email]> wrote: > Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 10:17 +0100, Richard Durr a écrit : > > As far as I can see, the only way to call external > Javascript is by > > writing Javascript-Code directly into a method like so: > > doSomethingWith: anObject > > {'return SOMELIBRARY.doSomething(anObject); '} > > > > > > is this correct? > > > No, you can call JS functions with: > #basicPerform: and #basicPerform:withArguments: > > Cheers, > Nicolas > > > > The OMETA based Smalltalk->JS translator seem to let one use > st-syntax > > for direct access to javascript like so: > > > > > > doSomethingWith: anObject [ > > SOMELIBRARY doSomething: anObject. > > ] > > > > > > and CoffeeScript can use JS seamlessly in the same way. > > > > > > Best regards, > > RD > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Nicolas Petton > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to share a project I'm working on on my > spare > > time: Jtalk > > Smalltalk. > > > > http://nicolaspetton.github.com/jtalk > > https://github.com/NicolasPetton/jtalk > > > > Jtalk is an implementation of the Smalltalk language > that > > compiles into > > JavaScript. > > > > Some features: > > - it is written in itself (including the > parser/compiler) > > - it is self-contained > > - it compiles into efficient JS code > > - it uses the Squeak chunk format > > - Pharo is considered as the reference > implementation > > > > I think Jtalk can be compared to CoffeeScript[1], > > Objective-J[2] or > > Clamato[3], from which it reuses some ideas and > code. > > > > Jtalk includes an IDE with a class browser, > transcript and > > workspace, an > > HTML canvas similar to Seaside and a jQuery binding. > > > > It is still a young piece of code, and some > important features > > are still > > missing/incomplete. > > > > Cheers, > > Nicolas Petton > > > > [1] http://jashkenas.github.com/coffee-script/ > > [2] http://cappuccino.org/ > > [3] http://clamato.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |