So....here is the list of things I guess are pending:
1) "Release" all configurations included in Pharo (this is, ConfigurationOfPharo and all it dependencies). I mean, we should NOT use or depend on #development versions. 2) Update the one click image to use latest cog images and "pharo prepared vms". There are some issues regarding this... 3) Write down all the things/summary done in Pharo 1.2 5) Update SystemVersion current -->> Pharo1.2rc2 of 27 January 2011 update 12340 6) Condense sources? condense changes? #cleanUpForRelease Cheers Mariano |
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: So....here is the list of things I guess are pending: I'll take a look at this... I had two weeks without programming, and I can't sleep now without doing something :P 2) Update the one click image to use latest cog images and "pharo prepared vms". There are some issues regarding this... |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
On Mar 12, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > So....here is the list of things I guess are pending: > > 1) "Release" all configurations included in Pharo (this is, ConfigurationOfPharo and all it dependencies). I mean, we should NOT use or depend on #development versions. mariano can you have a look at 1) > 2) Update the one click image to use latest cog images and "pharo prepared vms". There are some issues regarding this... > 3) Write down all the things/summary done in Pharo 1.2 > 5) Update SystemVersion current -->> Pharo1.2rc2 of 27 January 2011 update 12340 > 6) Condense sources? condense changes? #cleanUpForRelease > > Cheers > > Mariano |
In reply to this post by Guillermo Polito
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> wrote:
please, be my guest :)
|
F***, MethodWrappers.Tests.ObjectAsOneTimeMethodWrapperTest.testInstallOnClassCategory is broken again... Is it failing randomly? If so, can we remove that test? :(
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
On Mar 13, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: F***, MethodWrappers.Tests.ObjectAsOneTimeMethodWrapperTest.testInstallOnClassCategory is broken again... Is it failing randomly? If so, can we remove that test? :( It is failing randomly, yes. I thought I noted that in the original bug report? Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
Ok, I've blessed as release the version used in pharo dev from the following Configs:
ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras ConfigurationOfPharoNonCore ConfigurationOfPharoSound ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser ConfigurationOfScriptManager ConfigurationOfShout ConfigurationOfXMLSupport ConfigurationOfOCompletion ConfigurationOfNile ConfigurationOfObjectMetaTools These ones were already blessed: ConfigurationOfAutotest ConfigurationOfProfStef ConfigurationOfXMLWriter ConfigurationOfAutomaticMethodCategorizer These one left to be blessed: ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser (I'd like not to release it until we get that last issue fixed) ConfigurationOfMemoryMonitor (Alex, can the actual version be released?) ConfigurationOfPharo (I'd like not to release it until everything is ready) On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
thanks.
> Ok, I've blessed as release the version used in pharo dev from the following Configs: > > ConfigurationOfPharoMorphicExtras > ConfigurationOfPharoNonCore > ConfigurationOfPharoSound > ConfigurationOfRefactoringBrowser > ConfigurationOfScriptManager > ConfigurationOfShout > ConfigurationOfXMLSupport > ConfigurationOfOCompletion > ConfigurationOfNile > ConfigurationOfObjectMetaTools > > > These ones were already blessed: > > ConfigurationOfAutotest > ConfigurationOfProfStef > ConfigurationOfXMLWriter > ConfigurationOfAutomaticMethodCategorizer > > > These one left to be blessed: > > ConfigurationOfOmniBrowser (I'd like not to release it until we get that last issue fixed) > ConfigurationOfMemoryMonitor (Alex, can the actual version be released?) > ConfigurationOfPharo (I'd like not to release it until everything is ready) > > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: > So....here is the list of things I guess are pending: > > 1) "Release" all configurations included in Pharo (this is, ConfigurationOfPharo and all it dependencies). I mean, we should NOT use or depend on #development versions. > > I'll take a look at this... I had two weeks without programming, and I can't sleep now without doing something :P > > please, be my guest :) > > > 2) Update the one click image to use latest cog images and "pharo prepared vms". There are some issues regarding this... > 3) Write down all the things/summary done in Pharo 1.2 > 5) Update SystemVersion current -->> Pharo1.2rc2 of 27 January 2011 update 12340 > 6) Condense sources? condense changes? #cleanUpForRelease > > Cheers > > Mariano > > > |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: So....here is the list of things I guess are pending: so...can someone check this is done? GUillermo and me did it once...but it seems a lot of stuff was updated once again 2) Update the one click image to use latest cog images and "pharo prepared vms". There are some issues regarding this... Marcus, which is the status of this one ? 3) Write down all the things/summary done in Pharo 1.2 consider as done in nobody else comes with something better, 5) Update SystemVersion current -->> Pharo1.2rc2 of 27 January 2011 update 12340 SystemVersion current ->> Pharo1.2.1 of 2 April 2011 update 12345 so..it is ok, isn't it ? can we forget this item ? 6) Condense sources? condense changes? #cleanUpForRelease Marcus, is that necessary ? DEVImageCreator >> cleanUps ScriptLoader new cleanUpForRelease. "In Pharo 1.1 condenseChanges is VERY slow because of the new method trailers. So condensingChanges each time even when it is not needed is not a good idea anymore. So in case a condenseChanges is needed it should be done explicitly. Smalltalk condenseChanges." Smalltalk garbageCollect. I did that and I put that comment. Now that they are faster and that we have Hudson, should I put back the Smalltalk condenseChanges ? is there anything else needed? do we need a condenseSources ? -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com |
In reply to this post by Mariano Martinez Peck
On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
In general, for all pending things adding entries in the bug tracker is the only way ti make sure they are not forgotten.
I just gave up and took the image yesterday. Like you did for 1.1: Just build it once, don't care that it is repeatable.
I updated the one-click image with the last cog VM. For the one-click, it is identical to 1.1 with the only change that I put the windows VM I got from Torsten.
CondenseChange and CondenseSource is broken right now. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |