Sent from my iPad
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
On Ned, 2016-01-03 at 12:49 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> you have it: > > http://catalog.pharo.org That's nice, but there are, imho, too many pkgs with "No description provided", so maybe that should be made as mandatory? Sincerely, Gour -- In the material world, one who is unaffected by whatever good or evil he may obtain, neither praising it nor despising it, is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge. |
> On 04 Jan 2016, at 11:23, Saša Janiška <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Ned, 2016-01-03 at 12:49 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > >> you have it: >> >> http://catalog.pharo.org > > That's nice, but there are, imho, too many pkgs with "No description > provided", so maybe that should be made as mandatory? it is mandatory… but people does not provide them, and we could reject the projects, but then they will be irremediable lost. So we took the “least pain” path. I encourage people to provide correct project descriptions. cheers, Esteban > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > In the material world, one who is unaffected by whatever good > or evil he may obtain, neither praising it nor despising it, > is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge. > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Gour
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 02:23, Saša Janiška <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On Ned, 2016-01-03 at 12:49 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >> you have it: >> >> http://catalog.pharo.org > > That's nice, but there are, imho, too many pkgs with "No description > provided", so maybe that should be made as mandatory? > And many of the descriptions there aren't terribly descriptive. > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > In the material world, one who is unaffected by whatever good > or evil he may obtain, neither praising it nor despising it, > is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge. > > > > > |
In reply to this post by John Pfersich
I had it in the past and I readd it now ;( |
In reply to this post by John Pfersich
And many of the descriptions there aren't terribly descriptive.
If people do not value their work.... we cannot do more than what we are doing sadly Stef |
Could not agree more Stef
It takes no more than 10 minutes to document your project and it's only 2 methods, there are no excuses. Unfortunately you cannot force people to care about their own code. On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 09:10, stepharo <[hidden email]> wrote: And many of the descriptions there aren't terribly descriptive. |
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
> On 04 Jan 2016, at 12:07, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> On 04 Jan 2016, at 11:23, Saša Janiška <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On Ned, 2016-01-03 at 12:49 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >>> you have it: >>> >>> http://catalog.pharo.org >> >> That's nice, but there are, imho, too many pkgs with "No description >> provided", so maybe that should be made as mandatory? > > it is mandatory… but people does not provide them, and we could reject the projects, but then they will be irremediable lost. > So we took the “least pain” path. > > I encourage people to provide correct project descriptions. I updated a couple of my configs. > cheers, > Esteban > >> >> >> Sincerely, >> Gour >> >> -- >> In the material world, one who is unaffected by whatever good >> or evil he may obtain, neither praising it nor despising it, >> is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge. |
I encourage people to provide correct project descriptions. > I updated a couple of my configs. Good reaction! Stef > >> cheers, >> Esteban >> >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Gour >>> >>> -- >>> In the material world, one who is unaffected by whatever good >>> or evil he may obtain, neither praising it nor despising it, >>> is firmly fixed in perfect knowledge. > > |
I did the same
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |