Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Sebastian Heidbrink-2
Hi!

I just returned from a one on one Smalltalk introduction I gave tonight.

Can you please check for differences in the current Pharo3.0
one-click-images for Windows and Linux?

We had issues tonight that make it quite understandable that some
beginners might stop looking at Smalltalk after a while.

Date fromString: method
contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even
include an implementation.

The behavior of icons in the Class hierarchy are inconsitent on Ubuntu.
Where as entering a class comment changes the icons from an exclamation
mark to the green class icon on windows; in Ubuntu the super classes of
the class remain exclamation marks even hough they include comments.
The user thought he did something wrong,... or something is forbidden in
general.... the meaning of the icons does not to seem self-explainatory

Pharo 4.0 the mouse buttons are switched,... that is annoying
copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did
not work either.

But now also something positive.
The user tried to get started in Squeak last week and spent hours to
find out how things work and how to install stuff.
Tonight we setup pharo-launcher and two images.... 5 minutes later:
"Wow,... that was fast! And we can start now?"
:-D

By the way! Windows 8 pharo-launcher? Is there anything special to it? I
was not able to get it going tonight.

Cheers!
Sebastian


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Marcus Denker-4

> On 04 Mar 2015, at 08:45, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I just returned from a one on one Smalltalk introduction I gave tonight.
>
> Can you please check for differences in the current Pharo3.0 one-click-images for Windows and Linux?
>
> We had issues tonight that make it quite understandable that some beginners might stop looking at Smalltalk after a while.
>
> Date fromString: method
> contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even include an implementation.
>

Wow… that means that the sources file is corrupt.

> The behavior of icons in the Class hierarchy are inconsitent on Ubuntu.

> Where as entering a class comment changes the icons from an exclamation mark to the green class icon on windows; in Ubuntu the super classes of the class remain exclamation marks even hough they include comments.
> The user thought he did something wrong,... or something is forbidden in general.... the meaning of the icons does not to seem self-explainatory
>

This, too, is related to .changes: the class comment is stored there.

(ceterum censeo: we need to kill .sources and .changes…)

> Pharo 4.0 the mouse buttons are switched,... that is annoying
> copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did not work either.
>
> But now also something positive.
> The user tried to get started in Squeak last week and spent hours to find out how things work and how to install stuff.
> Tonight we setup pharo-launcher and two images.... 5 minutes later: "Wow,... that was fast! And we can start now?"
> :-D
>
> By the way! Windows 8 pharo-launcher? Is there anything special to it? I was not able to get it going tonight.
>
> Cheers!
> Sebastian
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Martin Bähr
Excerpts from Marcus Denker's message of 2015-03-04 09:13:45 +0100:
> > Date fromString: method
> > contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even include an implementation.
> Wow… that means that the sources file is corrupt.

actually, i thought the source file was simply missing.
pharo kept telling me every time i start that it can't find the V3 sources, until
i downloaded them manually and put them in the right place.

greetings, martin.

--
eKita                   -   the online platform for your entire academic life
--
chief engineer                                                       eKita.co
pike programmer      pike.lysator.liu.se    caudium.net     societyserver.org
secretary                                                      beijinglug.org
mentor                                                           fossasia.org
foresight developer  foresightlinux.org                            realss.com
unix sysadmin
Martin Bähr          working in china        http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Sebastian Heidbrink-2
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
Hi Marcus,

he installed the environment in front of my eyes via the Ubuntu ppa described on the website tonight.


sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pharo/stable
sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install pharo-launcher


Sebastian

On 2015-03-04 12:13 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:

      
On 04 Mar 2015, at 08:45, Sebastian Heidbrink [hidden email] wrote:

Hi!

I just returned from a one on one Smalltalk introduction I gave tonight.

Can you please check for differences in the current Pharo3.0 one-click-images for Windows and Linux?

We had issues tonight that make it quite understandable that some beginners might stop looking at Smalltalk after a while.

Date fromString: method
contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even include an implementation.

Wow… that means that the sources file is corrupt.

The behavior of icons in the Class hierarchy are inconsitent on Ubuntu.

      
Where as entering a class comment changes the icons from an exclamation mark to the green class icon on windows; in Ubuntu the super classes of the class remain exclamation marks even hough they include comments.
The user thought he did something wrong,... or something is forbidden in general.... the meaning of the icons does not to seem self-explainatory

This, too, is related to .changes: the class comment is stored there.

(ceterum censeo: we need to kill .sources and .changes…)

Pharo 4.0 the mouse buttons are switched,... that is annoying
copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did not work either.

But now also something positive.
The user tried to get started in Squeak last week and spent hours to find out how things work and how to install stuff.
Tonight we setup pharo-launcher and two images.... 5 minutes later: "Wow,... that was fast! And we can start now?"
:-D

By the way! Windows 8 pharo-launcher? Is there anything special to it? I was not able to get it going tonight.

Cheers!
Sebastian





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Sebastian Heidbrink-2
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
ooops.

and created a pharo 3.0 and 4.0 image via the launcher

Sebastian

On 2015-03-04 12:13 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:

>> On 04 Mar 2015, at 08:45, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I just returned from a one on one Smalltalk introduction I gave tonight.
>>
>> Can you please check for differences in the current Pharo3.0 one-click-images for Windows and Linux?
>>
>> We had issues tonight that make it quite understandable that some beginners might stop looking at Smalltalk after a while.
>>
>> Date fromString: method
>> contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even include an implementation.
>>
> Wow… that means that the sources file is corrupt.
>
>> The behavior of icons in the Class hierarchy are inconsitent on Ubuntu.
>> Where as entering a class comment changes the icons from an exclamation mark to the green class icon on windows; in Ubuntu the super classes of the class remain exclamation marks even hough they include comments.
>> The user thought he did something wrong,... or something is forbidden in general.... the meaning of the icons does not to seem self-explainatory
>>
> This, too, is related to .changes: the class comment is stored there.
>
> (ceterum censeo: we need to kill .sources and .changes…)
>
>> Pharo 4.0 the mouse buttons are switched,... that is annoying
>> copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did not work either.
>>
>> But now also something positive.
>> The user tried to get started in Squeak last week and spent hours to find out how things work and how to install stuff.
>> Tonight we setup pharo-launcher and two images.... 5 minutes later: "Wow,... that was fast! And we can start now?"
>> :-D
>>
>> By the way! Windows 8 pharo-launcher? Is there anything special to it? I was not able to get it going tonight.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Sean P. DeNigris
Administrator
In reply to this post by Sebastian Heidbrink-2
Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
I just returned from a one on one Smalltalk introduction I gave tonight.
Cool!!

Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
Date fromString: method
contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even
include an implementation.
Could you give more details about this? #fromString: contains no VM primitives and so should be bit identical on all platforms.

Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did
not work either.
IIRC this is a well-known problem with no solution yet :/

Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
Tonight we setup pharo-launcher and two images.... 5 minutes later:
"Wow,... that was fast! And we can start now?"
:-D
Yes, a /lot/ of work has gone into cleaning, simplifying, redesigning. Thanks for the encouragement :)
Cheers,
Sean
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

philippeback
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
>> I just returned from a one on one Smalltalk introduction I gave tonight.
>
> Cool!!
>
>
> Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
>> Date fromString: method
>> contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even
>> include an implementation.
>
> Could you give more details about this? #fromString: contains no VM
> primitives and so should be bit identical on all platforms.
>
>
> Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
>> copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did
>> not work either.

Beware, sometimes it is a Chrome problem, not a Pharo one.

>
> IIRC this is a well-known problem with no solution yet :/
>
>
> Sebastian Heidbrink-2 wrote
>> Tonight we setup pharo-launcher and two images.... 5 minutes later:
>> "Wow,... that was fast! And we can start now?"
>> :-D
>
> Yes, a /lot/ of work has gone into cleaning, simplifying, redesigning.
> Thanks for the encouragement :)
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Linux-and-Windows-3-0-differences-tp4809369p4809414.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



--
---
Philippe Back
Visible Performance Improvements
Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
Mail:[hidden email] | Web: http://philippeback.eu
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX
Value Added Reseller

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

S Krish
In reply to this post by Sebastian Heidbrink-2

"copy&paste from Chrome to Pharo 4.0 workspace/Playground on Ubuntu did not work either."

As also an issue if you do it from MS Office, MS Outlook .. et als.



I have mostly seen this to be a quote error.   That is the quote surrounding any string is copied with an encoding that makes it some other character that is not then executable in Pharo.

So while you copy paste, a) The Chrome content should be inside <pre> </pre>  tags to preserve the encoding. OR b) physically replace the characters with a quote in keyboard.

I do not think it is anything to do with Pharo to fix.


On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Sebastian Heidbrink <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Linux and Windows 3.0 differences

Markus Fritsche-4
In reply to this post by Martin Bähr
Hello Martin,

if you're using the ubuntu ppa, the sources file is *NOT* required by
the launcher (it works without it).

You can install the source by executing "apt-get install
pharo-sources-files"

Kind regards,
  Markus

On 04.03.2015 09:26, Martin Bähr wrote:

> Excerpts from Marcus Denker's message of 2015-03-04 09:13:45 +0100:
>>> Date fromString: method
>>> contains a method comment on Windows and on Ubuntu it doesn't even include an implementation.
>> Wow… that means that the sources file is corrupt.
> actually, i thought the source file was simply missing.
> pharo kept telling me every time i start that it can't find the V3 sources, until
> i downloaded them manually and put them in the right place.
>
> greetings, martin.
>