"Bill Schwab" <
[hidden email]> wrote in message
news:b8olu1$cae0e$
[hidden email]...
> Blair,
>
> My 5.0x image is a little bit of a kludge because I loaded the beta pl 2,
> and then never fully patched it after that. Appologies if that explains
the
> following.
>
> With that caveat, 5.0 has ListModel>>updateItem::ifAbsent: as deprecated,
> pointing to #refresh:ifAbsent:. My new 5.1 image does not include
> #refresh:ifAbsent:. Have I mangled things, did you change your mind about
> the deprecated status, or did this result from a version control hickup?
This is explained by your having stayed with the beta patch. Following
feedback we decided to withdraw the change for #994 from PL2 on the basis
that deprecating methods in a patch level is an inappropriate change. We
could have reinstanted it in the 5.1 minor release, but it has been held
over to the 6.0 major release.
Regards
Blair
Locked
