Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Seaside › Seaside General

LivePipe UI bindings for seaside

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

David Zmick-2

LivePipe UI bindings for seaside

I was wondering if anyone has successfully gotten LivePipe UI to function under seaside. I saw that Lukas Renggli was working on something here: http://groups.google.com/group/livepipe-ui-users/browse_thread/thread/7178059d4e7adc79?pli=1 and I wondered if i could get access to it and if it works.

Thanks!

--
David Zmick

[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

Lukas Renggli

Re: LivePipe UI bindings for seaside

I barely remember: That was in the beginning of Seaside 2.9/3.0 and
due to the inconvenient LivePipe UI API and growing popularity of
jQuery we moved to jQueryUI. You might still be able to find the
failed attempt somewhere on SqueakSource, but I am not sure if it ever
worked ...

Lukas

On Sunday, 26 December 2010, David Zmick <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I was wondering if anyone has successfully gotten LivePipe UI to function under seaside. I saw that Lukas Renggli was working on something here: http://groups.google.com/group/livepipe-ui-users/browse_thread/thread/7178059d4e7adc79?pli=1 and I wondered if i could get access to it and if it works.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> David [hidden email]
>
>
>
>

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

David Zmick-2

Re: LivePipe UI bindings for seaside

So would it be a better idea to implement an application using jQuery and jQueryUI instead of using scriptaculous/prototype? I have no been following any seaside news so I might be a bit behind.

Thank you for your quick reply also.

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:

I barely remember: That was in the beginning of Seaside 2.9/3.0 and
due to the inconvenient LivePipe UI API and growing popularity of
jQuery we moved to jQueryUI. You might still be able to find the
failed attempt somewhere on SqueakSource, but I am not sure if it ever
worked ...

Lukas

On Sunday, 26 December 2010, David Zmick <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has successfully gotten LivePipe UI to function under seaside. I saw that Lukas Renggli was working on something here: http://groups.google.com/group/livepipe-ui-users/browse_thread/thread/7178059d4e7adc79?pli=1 and I wondered if i could get access to it and if it works.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> David [hidden email]
>
>
>
>

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

--
David Zmick

[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

Lukas Renggli

Re: LivePipe UI bindings for seaside

On 26 December 2010 22:41, David Zmick <[hidden email]> wrote:
> So would it be a better idea to implement an application using jQuery and
> jQueryUI instead of using scriptaculous/prototype? I have no been following
> any seaside news so I might be a bit behind.
> Thank you for your quick reply also.

I think so, jQuery has an enormous community. The
script.aculo.us/prototype libraries have seen little (browser
compatibility) to no updates in the past years.

Lukas

--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

David Zmick-2

Re: LivePipe UI bindings for seaside

Alright. Thank you! I shall begin the transition to jQuery. I am sure I will have more questions, it is a good thing there is such a great community here to help me out!

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Lukas Renggli <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 26 December 2010 22:41, David Zmick <[hidden email]> wrote:
> So would it be a better idea to implement an application using jQuery and
> jQueryUI instead of using scriptaculous/prototype? I have no been following
> any seaside news so I might be a bit behind.
> Thank you for your quick reply also.

I think so, jQuery has an enormous community. The
script.aculo.us/prototype libraries have seen little (browser
compatibility) to no updates in the past years.

Lukas

--

Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

--
David Zmick

[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside