> I am curious as well. In regard to this I would not mind smaller more
> frequent patches rather than larger less frequent patches. I know Blair
> often posts them here (and I appreciate that),
Ditto!
> but it can be harder to keep
> track of them. However I suppose there is a certain level of testing
> overhead that might make it more work to do more frequent updates, so I
can
> understand if it is not doable.
Not doable? Would that not require an eXPlanation ;) Thought-provoking
humor aside, you raise a very good point.
One reason for official updates is that some of Blair's posts are in the
spirit of hot fixes to get a particular user going again. A few weeks after
Blair posts it, a given fix will have been shown to be solid, but most of us
will have forgotten about it :(
Have a good one,
Bill
--
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
[hidden email]