Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2862 posts
|
Dont know what you feed this monster but it took forever to load on Pharo 4 and now it gives me the error MNU receiver of "do:" is nil
Pharo 3 seems to work ok, so from what I gather this is a flow chart representation of Smalltalk language, very interesting , I like it very much. Are you serious about this project or its just a little experiment for you ? Blender users have been wanting a flow based programming language for some time, I have been looking into Phratch but apparently most people prefer flow charts like yours because its what they are used to to as users inside Blender and other 3d apps. So its also an area that interests me too for example procedural creation of 3d objects which is an area that Blender lacks right now while other apps like Houdini and Softimage have again been based on flow chart languages like yours. The nice thing about your approach is that is inside Pharo so it does not lock down into a flow chart-only approach as most implementations do. So the user can use LiveCode to quickly create code and then use normal text code to customise and further refine. Does that make sense to you ? I was thinking creating something similar myself but I was afraid it would be too much work. So I am definitely interested to learn how far you want to go with this . On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Administrator
5777 posts
|
Yes I should've mentioned that I've only tested on 3.0. I'm serious. I want this to be my only development tool. I remember how weak the old System Browser felt compared to OmniBrowser, and eagerly anticipated Nautilus. When it arrived I was in a very different place after researching the principles behind revolutionary systems SketchPad, Self, Morphic and others. So I realized that the real barrier to my expression was not the quality of the browser, but the browser concept itself. A browser, for me, is just too abstract, and keeps my mental model too far removed from "sending messages to live objects". I've been thinking carefully and going very slowly because there are so many ideas that it's easy to get lost trying to reinvent everything at once. I don't really know the next step until I live with the system for a while in each stage. Although I think once code editing and graph layout are implemented, there will be a reasonable foundation.
Cheers,
Sean |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2862 posts
|
glad to hear that maybe i can help, i will play with it and see if i can add some features myself. Looks simple enough from a first look but obviously I will have to look deeper :) Are you will keep this morphic based, or you thinking using spec ? On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]> wrote: kilon.alios wrote ... [show rest of quote] |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1618 posts
|
In reply to this post by Sean P. DeNigris
2014-10-24 19:27 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <[hidden email]>: kilon.alios wrote Then I'd be interested in what you end up with. When you focus on making something different your full time IDE, it ends up being an interesting exercise. I remember how weak the old System Browser felt compared to OmniBrowser, and I've been using Self as my main development environment for a few years, when I was doing my PhD. The idea was great, but something in the execution was getting in the way of efficient coding (or my efficient coding, I don't remember which). Looking at the newspeak GUI and there is something of the same nature, but I can't point out what. I've been thinking carefully and going very slowly because there are so many Keep working on it! Thierry
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |