Hello All,
We're migrating VW 7.6 code into VW 7.9. We now
have what looks to be a successful load for our first large code
group.
However, we have a very large number of methods
that appear to be flagged 'dirty' -- component condition indicators such as
(+1), or (+61) at package level.
But when browsing the dirty/changed methods
(Method Difference Browser) we have not found any difference (even whitespace)
between the previous and 'modified' method.
We are doing this before loading:
Refactory.Browser.BrowserCodeTool saveAutoFormat: false
If anyone has any sugs/tricks for this case, that
would be great. Assuming '+' is dirty method. Want to keep our change set small
as we migrate so we can manage and verify the migration.
Thank You,
Gary P
_______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
Dear Gary,
(just as background help) it may be you will need to describe what you are doing in more detail before anyone can help here. For example, I'm unclear whether you are replicating and reconciling, publishing from 7.6 and loading into 7.9, or something else, to see these changes. (Of course, if later posts show other readers are quite clear what you're doing, ignore this.) Yours faithfully Niall Ross >Hello All, > >We're migrating VW 7.6 code into VW 7.9. We now have what looks to be a successful load for our first large code group. > >However, we have a very large number of methods that appear to be flagged 'dirty' -- "component condition indicators" such as (+1), or (+61) at package level. > >But when browsing the dirty/changed methods ("Method Difference Browser") we have not found any difference (even whitespace) between the previous and 'modified' method. > >We are doing this before loading: > > Refactory.Browser.BrowserCodeTool saveAutoFormat: false > >If anyone has any sugs/tricks for this case, that would be great. Assuming '+' is dirty method. Want to keep our change set small as we migrate so we can manage and verify the migration. > >Thank You, > >Gary P > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >vwnc mailing list >[hidden email] >http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc > > _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
Thanks Niall,
correct -> "publishing from 7.6 and loading into 7.9" bytes are identical, but flagged dirty. Will try to isolate it a bit more on this end to produce better details and question -- or realize how I'm dumbing out.... :\) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Niall Ross" <[hidden email]> To: "Gary Peterson" <[hidden email]> Cc: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [vwnc] Loading into 7.9 and seem to false flag for 'changed' methods? > Dear Gary, > (just as background help) it may be you will need to describe what you > are doing in more detail before anyone can help here. For example, I'm > unclear whether you are replicating and reconciling, publishing from 7.6 > and loading into 7.9, or something else, to see these changes. > > (Of course, if later posts show other readers are quite clear what you're > doing, ignore this.) > > Yours faithfully > Niall Ross > >>Hello All, >> >>We're migrating VW 7.6 code into VW 7.9. We now have what looks to be a >>successful load for our first large code group. >> >>However, we have a very large number of methods that appear to be flagged >>'dirty' -- "component condition indicators" such as (+1), or (+61) at >>package level. >> >>But when browsing the dirty/changed methods ("Method Difference Browser") >>we have not found any difference (even whitespace) between the previous >>and 'modified' method. >> >>We are doing this before loading: >> Refactory.Browser.BrowserCodeTool saveAutoFormat: false >> >>If anyone has any sugs/tricks for this case, that would be great. Assuming >>'+' is dirty method. Want to keep our change set small as we migrate so we >>can manage and verify the migration. >> >>Thank You, >> >>Gary P >> >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>vwnc mailing list >>[hidden email] >>http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc >> > > _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
When I load, either packages that contain overrides, or packages that are
overridden, end up getting marked dirty. My solution is to reconcile those packages after loading. Terry =========================================================== Terry Raymond Crafted Smalltalk 80 Lazywood Ln. Tiverton, RI 02878 (401) 624-4517 [hidden email] =========================================================== > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On > Behalf Of Gary Peterson > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 10:16 AM > To: Niall Ross > Cc: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [vwnc] Loading into 7.9 and seem to false flag for 'changed' > methods? > > Thanks Niall, > > correct -> "publishing from 7.6 and loading into 7.9" > bytes are identical, but flagged dirty. > > Will try to isolate it a bit more on this end to produce better details > question -- or realize how I'm dumbing out.... :\) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niall Ross" <[hidden email]> > To: "Gary Peterson" <[hidden email]> > Cc: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:19 AM > Subject: Re: [vwnc] Loading into 7.9 and seem to false flag for 'changed' > methods? > > > > Dear Gary, > > (just as background help) it may be you will need to describe what > > are doing in more detail before anyone can help here. For example, I'm > > unclear whether you are replicating and reconciling, publishing from 7.6 > > and loading into 7.9, or something else, to see these changes. > > > > (Of course, if later posts show other readers are quite clear what you're > > doing, ignore this.) > > > > Yours faithfully > > Niall Ross > > > >>Hello All, > >> > >>We're migrating VW 7.6 code into VW 7.9. We now have what looks to be a > >>successful load for our first large code group. > >> > >>However, we have a very large number of methods that appear to be > flagged > >>'dirty' -- "component condition indicators" such as (+1), or (+61) at > >>package level. > >> > >>But when browsing the dirty/changed methods ("Method Difference > Browser") > >>we have not found any difference (even whitespace) between the > previous > >>and 'modified' method. > >> > >>We are doing this before loading: > >> Refactory.Browser.BrowserCodeTool saveAutoFormat: false > >> > >>If anyone has any sugs/tricks for this case, that would be great. > >>'+' is dirty method. Want to keep our change set small as we migrate so we > >>can manage and verify the migration. > >> > >>Thank You, > >> > >>Gary P > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>vwnc mailing list > >>[hidden email] > >>http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > vwnc mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc _______________________________________________ vwnc mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/vwnc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |