Thanks.
Indeed we should improve one step at a time.
And this is great to see Pharo getting improved so much.
I once discussed with K. Beck and he told me that indeed we often forget how powerful it is
to do one little improvement at a time.
So let us continue and this is cool that you got that Pharo is yours :)
Stef
> On 13 Mar 2019, at 18:28, Alistair Grant <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 11:21, Marcus Denker <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The code is barely usable, I am sure it is not complete and wrong in many places.
>
> Hopefully it will be a bit more usable and a little less wrong when
> I'm finished :-)
>
> I've been able to use it to parse and load mail headers (about 23,000
> messages), so it isn't all bad. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Alistair
>
>
>
>>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 11:09, Alistair Grant <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm playing with parsing and searching mail messages at the moment and
>>> am wondering about the interaction of MailMessage and MIMEDocument.
>>>
>>> A MailMessage contains a body which is a MIMEDocument, but if I request
>>> the parts of the body I get back multiple MailMessages, i.e. the parts
>>> of a MIMEDocument are a collection of MailMesssages.
>>>
>>> MIME documents are used outside of mail messages, e.g. HTTP, so the
>>> parts of a MIMEDocument should also be MIMEDocument's and not
>>> MailMessage's. This is also implied by the MIME description at
>>> wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIME>>>
>>> Some of the method comments seem to suggest that this was put together
>>> quickly, so it is possible that the intention was to do it properly at a
>>> later date (which never happened :-)).
>>>
>>> Am I missing something, or is it OK for me to modify MIMEDocument to
>>> return MIMEDocuments as the parts?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alistair
>>>
>>
>>
>
Locked
