MacroRecorder updates (+ another demo)

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

MacroRecorder updates (+ another demo)

Gustavo Santos
Hello guys,

thanks for the support so far. I've been working on your suggestions.

Some of them concerned that the example in the first demo video was too "magic". :-P
So I made another video showing how the developer can manually configure the tool.
( first demo here: https://youtu.be/gW3l4O-WEGs )

Also, I kindly remind you that I'm interested in usage data:
- if you systematically modified code in the past, show me.
- if you created a custom transformation with the tool, show me; or
- if you had problems using the tool, show me too! :-)

Feel free to provide any feedback.

Cheers,

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Pharo-dev] MacroRecorder updates (+ another demo)

Damien Cassou-2
Gustavo Santos <[hidden email]> writes:

> Hello guys,
>
> thanks for the support so far. I've been working on your suggestions.
>
> Some of them concerned that the example in the first demo video was too
> "magic". :-P
> So I made another video showing how the developer can manually configure
> the tool.
> Take a look: https://youtu.be/3xc3j3PjIYQ

great! But you stopped the video just before showing what happens for
indirect subclasses of JenkinsObject. Does macro recorder work for the
sub-sub-classes as well?

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Pharo-dev] MacroRecorder updates (+ another demo)

Gustavo Santos
Once you created the superclass, yes.
Otherwise, there will be an error when you execute the transformation, because the superclass you indicated does not exist.

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Damien Cassou <[hidden email]> wrote:
Gustavo Santos <[hidden email]> writes:

> Hello guys,
>
> thanks for the support so far. I've been working on your suggestions.
>
> Some of them concerned that the example in the first demo video was too
> "magic". :-P
> So I made another video showing how the developer can manually configure
> the tool.
> Take a look: https://youtu.be/3xc3j3PjIYQ

great! But you stopped the video just before showing what happens for
indirect subclasses of JenkinsObject. Does macro recorder work for the
sub-sub-classes as well?

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill

--

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev