Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Making some progress, and a few observations

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

22 messages Options

Esteban A. Maringolo

Re: Making some progress, and a few observations

2009/7/16 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>:
> I think it has no sense to test with several images. Look adrian comment
>
> "This basically measures how many bytecodes and messages the VM can
> execute per second."
>
> So, I guess it is a benchmark for VM + hardware. I don't think the image
> can influence much here. Am I correct?

Oookay, sorry.

However, I understand the 2.8.3 one-click and 2.8.4 one click have
different VM's.

With the latest pharo-web, with NOD32 antivirus disabled, the speed up
was pretty significant.

Regards,

--
Esteban

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: Making some progress, and a few observations

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <[hidden email]> wrote:

With the latest pharo-web, with NOD32 antivirus disabled, the speed up
was pretty significant.

yes. Nod32 WON'T let you use Squeak, Pharo, Quis or whatever. You can notice this when you use monticello. As the .changes is being changed a lot, nod32 is inspecting it all the time.....unusable.

Solution: exclude the directory where the .changes is fron Nod32 configuration!

Regards,

--
Esteban

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project