|
This seems to be part of the "Run Coverage" mechanism of the test runner. For coverage analysis one can add (for a test class) which package should be analysed (packageNamesUnderTest). Then classNamesNotUnderTest is there to *exclude* single classes from that.
To me that makes sense for a coverage tool. But the names are bad *and* it should be not in the Testrunner, but a tool on top.
The question is if we want to change that now...
|
|
|
Priority: 5 – Fix If Time
|
|
Status: Work Needed
|
|
Assigned to: Everyone
|
|
Milestone: Later
|
Go to Case
|
|