Pharo Issue Tracker - Manuscript (Case [Issue]22395) _Inbox - Logic of declaring actions for nodes in SugsSuggestions is not really good

Manuscript (Case [Issue]22395) _Inbox - Logic of declaring actions for nodes in SugsSuggestions is not really good

Manuscript Notification

	Marcus Denker edited Case 22395: Logic of declaring actions for nodes in SugsSuggestions is not really good : Bug in _Inbox: Not Spam • You are subscribed to this case

The SugsSuggestionFactory was >300 lines of code, *a lot* of class instance variables, and a huge mess.

For the redesign, it was not known that AST nodes are ever possible that are not subclasses of RBProgramNode.

It am sure that we can find a solution for this that is not as bad as SugsSuggestionFactory was.

	Priority: 5 – Fix If Time		Status: Work Needed
	Assigned to: Everyone		Milestone: Later

Go to Case

No longer need updates? Unsubscribe from this case.

Don't want Manuscript notifications anymore? Update your preferences.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker