Merlin

As far as I know, nobody is maintaining Merlin anymore.

Actually, I would not use it. Why not using Glamour or Spec?

Alexandre

On Feb 9, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Usman Bhatti <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Is it possible to provide objects instead of labels for the widgets in Merlin? I am particularly thinking about MultiCheckboxesPart so that it is provided with some objects and it shows their labels. Later, I would like to get the user selection object instead of a label.
>
> Currently, I only know how to provide labels and once user chooses (e.g. a checkbox, i only get the selected label) and then I have to keep a dictionary to determine the corresponding selector. Ideally, we should provide an object along with a selector to get the labels/other properties to be displayed.
>
> May be something to take up at the upcoming sprint.
>
> regards,
> Usman

> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

As far as I know, nobody is maintaining Merlin anymore.

Agreed, but it has some nice support for creating dialogue boxes for user questions and it is still an integral part of Moose interface.

 

Actually, I would not use it. Why not using Glamour or Spec?

Glamour provides only higher-level interfaces, hence basic widgets such as checkboxes and radio buttons are difficult to embed. 

For Spec, I don't know if we have such a domain-specific extension for user dialogues.