Message>>#arguments:

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Message>>#arguments:

Noury Bouraqadi-2
Hi,


Is there any reason why we don’t have this method

Message>>#arguments: anArray
        args := anArray

We already have the read accessor. There is also a write accessor for single argument messages.

Any hint?

Noury
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Message>>#arguments:

EstebanLM
no idea…
but in a philosophical point of view, the fact that you have an accessor doesn’t means that you should have a mutator ;)

Esteban

> On 20 Nov 2014, at 13:51, Noury Bouraqadi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there any reason why we don’t have this method
>
> Message>>#arguments: anArray
> args := anArray
>
> We already have the read accessor. There is also a write accessor for single argument messages.
>
> Any hint?
>
> Noury