Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Metacello and SourceTalk ...

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

5 messages Options

Geert Claes

Metacello and SourceTalk ...

Administrator

SourceTalk/Monticello 2 hasn't been top priority because there have been plenty of other more urgent matters that required attention.

Maybe with all the discussion around Metacello, Repositories, Pharo Release, Code Freeze, Continuous Integration etc ... it may be a good idea to use this momentum to look at SourceTalk/Monticello 2 again? The name SourceTalk probably makes more sense with the idea of the Repository serving the Squeak and Pharo communities. SourceTalk should probably also remove the need for projects to use Google Code simply for its Wiki and Issue Tracker.

A number of other "Ideas To Implement" (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/IdeasToImplement) have already made it to the next stage.

Mariano Martinez Peck

Re: Metacello and SourceTalk ...

Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it.
That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2

Cheers

Mariano

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Geert Claes <[hidden email]> wrote:

SourceTalk/Monticello 2 hasn't been top priority because there have been
plenty of other more urgent matters that required attention.

Maybe with all the discussion around Metacello, Repositories, Pharo Release,
Code Freeze, Continuous Integration etc ... it may be a good idea to use
this momentum to look at SourceTalk/Monticello 2 again? The name SourceTalk
probably makes more sense with the idea of the Repository serving the Squeak
and Pharo communities. SourceTalk should probably also remove the need for
projects to use Google Code simply for its Wiki and Issue Tracker.

A number of other "Ideas To Implement"
(http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/IdeasToImplement) have already made it
to the next stage.
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219294.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Geert Claes

Re: Metacello and SourceTalk ...

Administrator

What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like SourceTalk?

Mariano Martinez Peck wrote

Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo 1.2

Julian Fitzell-2

Re: Metacello and SourceTalk ...

The fact that MC2 is still a moving target. Or at least it would be if it was moving. :) More to the point, the early releases had some problems that prompted further redesign and I'd recommend against creating large amounts of date in those versions that will need to be brought forward. In other words, I don't think it's ready for prime time in its current state.

Julian

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Geert Claes <[hidden email]> wrote:

What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like
SourceTalk?

Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for
> Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see
> squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems
> "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it
> would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo
> 1.2
>

--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219517.html

Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Stéphane Ducasse

Re: Metacello and SourceTalk ...

thanks for the update.

Stef

On May 24, 2010, at 2:42 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:

> The fact that MC2 is still a moving target. Or at least it would be if it was moving. :) More to the point, the early releases had some problems that prompted further redesign and I'd recommend against creating large amounts of date in those versions that will need to be brought forward. In other words, I don't think it's ready for prime time in its current state.
>
> Julian
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Geert Claes <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> What would be the biggest challenges moving to MC2 and a MC2 Repository like
> SourceTalk?
>
>
> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> >
> > Hi Geert. I agree it would awesome to have Monticello 2 and SourcTalk for
> > Pharo 1.2. I have not idea the status. I tested once (you can see
> > squeakdbx there) but I have a lot of problems. And the project seems
> > "dead". I mean, I don't think someone is working on it. That said, it
> > would be great someone to work on it and maybe start to using it by Pharo
> > 1.2
> >
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-and-SourceTalk-tp2219294p2219517.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project