Migration of the Customizable System Complexity view

Perfect for the borders of the shape and of the popup.

Thanks
Anne
Le 11 avr. 2014 à 21:11, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :

> I have just committed the fix.
>
> El 11-04-2014, a las 14:10, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>> Juraj is currently working on the border
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, we migrated the Customizable System Complexity view of the Moose Panel from Roassal to Roassal2.
>>> The render is not so beautiful due to the border and the popUp.
>>> We hope that the behavior of the view remains the same.
>>>
>>> Leo, Kevin and Anne.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Hi Anne!

I was not able to make the example run. Maybe I run an old Moose image. I have created a couple of weeks ago a RTBoundedShapeBuilder. Mondrian uses it.

For example:

| b |
b := RTMondrianViewBuilder new.
b shape rectangle size: #yourself.
b nodes: (1 to: 20).
b open

Produce the following:

Is this what you expect?

Alexandre

On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

You can use Customizable System Complexity view from the MoosePanel while right clicking on a group of classes, then visualize and then the fourth item. I made a screenshot to explain and another showing the visu on a MooseModel. I didn't know this visu before Friday, but it is I think a great one ;o)

I modified the code of the MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: method. 
We just modified it to migrate it and the called method from Roassal to Roassal2.

Anne

<CSCView.png><MoosePanel.png>

Le 15 avr. 2014 à 17:29, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :

We indeed need a way to have limit for the size. But we have to do it in a nice way. For example, with GraphET we often need elements smaller than 5 x 5.
How do you define Customizable System Complexity view?
Can I have a look at it?

Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I took your email for us Doru, so I did it for the specific visu, but I think that I shouldn't. Indeed, in Roassal a ROShape had a size of 5@5 by default (defaultExtent, I think). In Roassal2, such default size has not been implemented. So I put a patch in the System Complexity View, but I think that it should be done everywhere.

So Alex, can you, please, set a minimum width and height in Roassal2 as it was in Roassal? When it is done, I will remove my patch.

Currently, it works.
Anne


Le 15 avr. 2014 à 07:10, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi,

Thanks for working on this. However, the System Complexity View requires a minimum width and height. Could you make it so that it is at least 5?

Doru


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
Perfect for the borders of the shape and of the popup.

Thanks
Anne
Le 11 avr. 2014 à 21:11, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :

> I have just committed the fix.
>
> El 11-04-2014, a las 14:10, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>> Juraj is currently working on the border
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, we migrated the Customizable System Complexity view of the Moose Panel from Roassal to Roassal2.
>>> The render is not so beautiful due to the border and the popUp.
>>> We hope that the behavior of the view remains the same.
>>>
>>> Leo, Kevin and Anne.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Hi,

I will try to modify the Customizable System Complexity to work with the MondrianBuilder. By the way, does it means that normally, the RTView should not be directly manipulated for a visualization, but only builder?

Anne

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:20, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi Alex,

The recent implementation of the Customizable System Complexity works directly with the RTView. This is where the issue comes from :). We should change it to work with the MondrianBuilder.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Anne!

I was not able to make the example run. Maybe I run an old Moose image. I have created a couple of weeks ago a RTBoundedShapeBuilder. Mondrian uses it.

For example:

| b |
b := RTMondrianViewBuilder new.
b shape rectangle size: #yourself.
b nodes: (1 to: 20).
b open

Produce the following:

<Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 7.21.14 PM.png>

Is this what you expect?

Alexandre

On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

You can use Customizable System Complexity view from the MoosePanel while right clicking on a group of classes, then visualize and then the fourth item. I made a screenshot to explain and another showing the visu on a MooseModel. I didn't know this visu before Friday, but it is I think a great one ;o)

I modified the code of the MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: method. 
We just modified it to migrate it and the called method from Roassal to Roassal2.

Anne

<CSCView.png><MoosePanel.png>

Le 15 avr. 2014 à 17:29, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :

We indeed need a way to have limit for the size. But we have to do it in a nice way. For example, with GraphET we often need elements smaller than 5 x 5.
How do you define Customizable System Complexity view?
Can I have a look at it?

Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I took your email for us Doru, so I did it for the specific visu, but I think that I shouldn't. Indeed, in Roassal a ROShape had a size of 5@5 by default (defaultExtent, I think). In Roassal2, such default size has not been implemented. So I put a patch in the System Complexity View, but I think that it should be done everywhere.

So Alex, can you, please, set a minimum width and height in Roassal2 as it was in Roassal? When it is done, I will remove my patch.

Currently, it works.
Anne


Le 15 avr. 2014 à 07:10, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi,

Thanks for working on this. However, the System Complexity View requires a minimum width and height. Could you make it so that it is at least 5?

Doru


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
Perfect for the borders of the shape and of the popup.

Thanks
Anne
Le 11 avr. 2014 à 21:11, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :

> I have just committed the fix.
>
> El 11-04-2014, a las 14:10, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>> Juraj is currently working on the border
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, we migrated the Customizable System Complexity view of the Moose Panel from Roassal to Roassal2.
>>> The render is not so beautiful due to the border and the popUp.
>>> We hope that the behavior of the view remains the same.
>>>
>>> Leo, Kevin and Anne.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

In fact I tried with Leo to use RTMondrianViewBuilder, but it seems that it is not possible.

Indeed, the view in the painting: block parameter is a RTView. I don't want to modify the initialize method of GLMRoassal2Presentation.

So perhaps I am wrong, but it seems not so easy for the Customizable System Complexity to use RTMondrianViewBuilder.

Please find below GLMRoassal2Presentation >>initialize and MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

Anne

GLMRoassal2Presentation >>initialize 

super initialize.

newViewBlock := [ RTView new ].

shouldPopulateSelection := true.

self defaultActions

MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

^ a roassal2

painting: [ :view :group :height :width :color :presentation | 

group key

viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: OrderedCollection new

height: [:e | (height value:e) max: 5]

width: [:e | (width value:e) max: 5]

color: color

on: view ]

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:54, Tudor Girba a écrit :

No, it does not mean that :).

Builders are useful when the target visualization matches the metaphor of the builder. For example, the MondrianBuilder is made for a graph visualization like System Complexity. But, if you would want to visualize a graph that places a lot of emphasis on position and animation, it is probably easier to work with RTView.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I will try to modify the Customizable System Complexity to work with the MondrianBuilder. By the way, does it means that normally, the RTView should not be directly manipulated for a visualization, but only builder?

Anne

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:20, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi Alex,

The recent implementation of the Customizable System Complexity works directly with the RTView. This is where the issue comes from :). We should change it to work with the MondrianBuilder.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Anne!

I was not able to make the example run. Maybe I run an old Moose image. I have created a couple of weeks ago a RTBoundedShapeBuilder. Mondrian uses it.

For example:

| b |
b := RTMondrianViewBuilder new.
b shape rectangle size: #yourself.
b nodes: (1 to: 20).
b open

Produce the following:

<Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 7.21.14 PM.png>

Is this what you expect?

Alexandre

On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

You can use Customizable System Complexity view from the MoosePanel while right clicking on a group of classes, then visualize and then the fourth item. I made a screenshot to explain and another showing the visu on a MooseModel. I didn't know this visu before Friday, but it is I think a great one ;o)

I modified the code of the MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: method. 
We just modified it to migrate it and the called method from Roassal to Roassal2.

Anne

<CSCView.png><MoosePanel.png>

Le 15 avr. 2014 à 17:29, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :

We indeed need a way to have limit for the size. But we have to do it in a nice way. For example, with GraphET we often need elements smaller than 5 x 5.
How do you define Customizable System Complexity view?
Can I have a look at it?

Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I took your email for us Doru, so I did it for the specific visu, but I think that I shouldn't. Indeed, in Roassal a ROShape had a size of 5@5 by default (defaultExtent, I think). In Roassal2, such default size has not been implemented. So I put a patch in the System Complexity View, but I think that it should be done everywhere.

So Alex, can you, please, set a minimum width and height in Roassal2 as it was in Roassal? When it is done, I will remove my patch.

Currently, it works.
Anne


Le 15 avr. 2014 à 07:10, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi,

Thanks for working on this. However, the System Complexity View requires a minimum width and height. Could you make it so that it is at least 5?

Doru


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
Perfect for the borders of the shape and of the popup.

Thanks
Anne
Le 11 avr. 2014 à 21:11, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :

> I have just committed the fix.
>
> El 11-04-2014, a las 14:10, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>> Juraj is currently working on the border
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, we migrated the Customizable System Complexity view of the Moose Panel from Roassal to Roassal2.
>>> The render is not so beautiful due to the border and the popUp.
>>> We hope that the behavior of the view remains the same.
>>>
>>> Leo, Kevin and Anne.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

It does not work. We (Leo and I) made this insertion and modified the viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: height: width: color: on: to apply on RTMondrianBuilder and no more on an RTView. But it really seems that GLMRoassal2Presentation is waiting for an RTView as view and not a RTMondrianViewBuilder. The elements method does not exist on a RTMondrianViewBuilder.

So it seems that it is really more complex to use a RTMondrianViewBuilder in the Customizable System Complexity view since it has repercussions on Glamour.

Leo and Anne

GLMRoassal2Presentation >> renderOn: aView

self paintingBlock glamourValue: (

aView asGlamorousMultiValue, 

self entity asGlamorousMultiValue,

self asGlamorousMultiValue ).

" self flag: 'This should be the responsibility of the the view'.

aView applyLayout. "

self shouldPopulateSelection ifTrue: [

aView elements do: [:each |  

each on: TRMouseLeftClick do: [:event | self selection: each model ]] ].

self view: aView

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 11:25, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Ah, I see the confusion.

You can just do:

MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

^ a roassal2

                initializeView: [ RTMondrianViewBuilder new ]

painting: [ :view :group :height :width :color :presentation | 

group key

viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: OrderedCollection new

height: [:e | (height value:e) max: 5]

width: [:e | (width value:e) max: 5]

color: color

on: view ]

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

In fact I tried with Leo to use RTMondrianViewBuilder, but it seems that it is not possible.

Indeed, the view in the painting: block parameter is a RTView. I don't want to modify the initialize method of GLMRoassal2Presentation.

So perhaps I am wrong, but it seems not so easy for the Customizable System Complexity to use RTMondrianViewBuilder.

Please find below GLMRoassal2Presentation >>initialize and MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

Anne

GLMRoassal2Presentation >>initialize 

super initialize.

newViewBlock := [ RTView new ].

shouldPopulateSelection := true.

self defaultActions

MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

^ a roassal2

painting: [ :view :group :height :width :color :presentation | 

group key

viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: OrderedCollection new

height: [:e | (height value:e) max: 5]

width: [:e | (width value:e) max: 5]

color: color

on: view ]

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:54, Tudor Girba a écrit :

No, it does not mean that :).

Builders are useful when the target visualization matches the metaphor of the builder. For example, the MondrianBuilder is made for a graph visualization like System Complexity. But, if you would want to visualize a graph that places a lot of emphasis on position and animation, it is probably easier to work with RTView.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I will try to modify the Customizable System Complexity to work with the MondrianBuilder. By the way, does it means that normally, the RTView should not be directly manipulated for a visualization, but only builder?

Anne

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:20, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi Alex,

The recent implementation of the Customizable System Complexity works directly with the RTView. This is where the issue comes from :). We should change it to work with the MondrianBuilder.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Anne!

I was not able to make the example run. Maybe I run an old Moose image. I have created a couple of weeks ago a RTBoundedShapeBuilder. Mondrian uses it.

For example:

| b |
b := RTMondrianViewBuilder new.
b shape rectangle size: #yourself.
b nodes: (1 to: 20).
b open

Produce the following:

<Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 7.21.14 PM.png>

Is this what you expect?

Alexandre

On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

You can use Customizable System Complexity view from the MoosePanel while right clicking on a group of classes, then visualize and then the fourth item. I made a screenshot to explain and another showing the visu on a MooseModel. I didn't know this visu before Friday, but it is I think a great one ;o)

I modified the code of the MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: method. 
We just modified it to migrate it and the called method from Roassal to Roassal2.

Anne

<CSCView.png><MoosePanel.png>

Le 15 avr. 2014 à 17:29, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :

We indeed need a way to have limit for the size. But we have to do it in a nice way. For example, with GraphET we often need elements smaller than 5 x 5.
How do you define Customizable System Complexity view?
Can I have a look at it?

Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I took your email for us Doru, so I did it for the specific visu, but I think that I shouldn't. Indeed, in Roassal a ROShape had a size of 5@5 by default (defaultExtent, I think). In Roassal2, such default size has not been implemented. So I put a patch in the System Complexity View, but I think that it should be done everywhere.

So Alex, can you, please, set a minimum width and height in Roassal2 as it was in Roassal? When it is done, I will remove my patch.

Currently, it works.
Anne


Le 15 avr. 2014 à 07:10, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi,

Thanks for working on this. However, the System Complexity View requires a minimum width and height. Could you make it so that it is at least 5?

Doru


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
Perfect for the borders of the shape and of the popup.

Thanks
Anne
Le 11 avr. 2014 à 21:11, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :

> I have just committed the fix.
>
> El 11-04-2014, a las 14:10, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>> Juraj is currently working on the border
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, we migrated the Customizable System Complexity view of the Moose Panel from Roassal to Roassal2.
>>> The render is not so beautiful due to the border and the popUp.
>>> We hope that the behavior of the view remains the same.
>>>
>>> Leo, Kevin and Anne.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Thanks for the report. Please open a bug and I will fix it. This is still a construction site :)

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

It does not work. We (Leo and I) made this insertion and modified the viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: height: width: color: on: to apply on RTMondrianBuilder and no more on an RTView. But it really seems that GLMRoassal2Presentation is waiting for an RTView as view and not a RTMondrianViewBuilder. The elements method does not exist on a RTMondrianViewBuilder.

So it seems that it is really more complex to use a RTMondrianViewBuilder in the Customizable System Complexity view since it has repercussions on Glamour.

Leo and Anne

GLMRoassal2Presentation >> renderOn: aView

self paintingBlock glamourValue: (

aView asGlamorousMultiValue, 

self entity asGlamorousMultiValue,

self asGlamorousMultiValue ).

" self flag: 'This should be the responsibility of the the view'.

aView applyLayout. "

self shouldPopulateSelection ifTrue: [

aView elements do: [:each |  

each on: TRMouseLeftClick do: [:event | self selection: each model ]] ].

self view: aView

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 11:25, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Ah, I see the confusion.

You can just do:

MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

^ a roassal2

                initializeView: [ RTMondrianViewBuilder new ]

painting: [ :view :group :height :width :color :presentation | 

group key

viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: OrderedCollection new

height: [:e | (height value:e) max: 5]

width: [:e | (width value:e) max: 5]

color: color

on: view ]

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

In fact I tried with Leo to use RTMondrianViewBuilder, but it seems that it is not possible.

Indeed, the view in the painting: block parameter is a RTView. I don't want to modify the initialize method of GLMRoassal2Presentation.

So perhaps I am wrong, but it seems not so easy for the Customizable System Complexity to use RTMondrianViewBuilder.

Please find below GLMRoassal2Presentation >>initialize and MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

Anne

GLMRoassal2Presentation >>initialize 

super initialize.

newViewBlock := [ RTView new ].

shouldPopulateSelection := true.

self defaultActions

MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: a

^ a roassal2

painting: [ :view :group :height :width :color :presentation | 

group key

viewSimpleSystemComplexityWithSelection: OrderedCollection new

height: [:e | (height value:e) max: 5]

width: [:e | (width value:e) max: 5]

color: color

on: view ]

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:54, Tudor Girba a écrit :

No, it does not mean that :).

Builders are useful when the target visualization matches the metaphor of the builder. For example, the MondrianBuilder is made for a graph visualization like System Complexity. But, if you would want to visualize a graph that places a lot of emphasis on position and animation, it is probably easier to work with RTView.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I will try to modify the Customizable System Complexity to work with the MondrianBuilder. By the way, does it means that normally, the RTView should not be directly manipulated for a visualization, but only builder?

Anne

Le 16 avr. 2014 à 07:20, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi Alex,

The recent implementation of the Customizable System Complexity works directly with the RTView. This is where the issue comes from :). We should change it to work with the MondrianBuilder.

Doru

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Anne!

I was not able to make the example run. Maybe I run an old Moose image. I have created a couple of weeks ago a RTBoundedShapeBuilder. Mondrian uses it.

For example:

| b |
b := RTMondrianViewBuilder new.
b shape rectangle size: #yourself.
b nodes: (1 to: 20).
b open

Produce the following:

<Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 7.21.14 PM.png>

Is this what you expect?

Alexandre

On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

You can use Customizable System Complexity view from the MoosePanel while right clicking on a group of classes, then visualize and then the fourth item. I made a screenshot to explain and another showing the visu on a MooseModel. I didn't know this visu before Friday, but it is I think a great one ;o)

I modified the code of the MooseCustomizableSystemComplexityBrowser>>complexityIn: method. 
We just modified it to migrate it and the called method from Roassal to Roassal2.

Anne

<CSCView.png><MoosePanel.png>

Le 15 avr. 2014 à 17:29, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :

We indeed need a way to have limit for the size. But we have to do it in a nice way. For example, with GraphET we often need elements smaller than 5 x 5.
How do you define Customizable System Complexity view?
Can I have a look at it?

Alexandre

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

I took your email for us Doru, so I did it for the specific visu, but I think that I shouldn't. Indeed, in Roassal a ROShape had a size of 5@5 by default (defaultExtent, I think). In Roassal2, such default size has not been implemented. So I put a patch in the System Complexity View, but I think that it should be done everywhere.

So Alex, can you, please, set a minimum width and height in Roassal2 as it was in Roassal? When it is done, I will remove my patch.

Currently, it works.
Anne


Le 15 avr. 2014 à 07:10, Tudor Girba a écrit :

Hi,

Thanks for working on this. However, the System Complexity View requires a minimum width and height. Could you make it so that it is at least 5?

Doru


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
Perfect for the borders of the shape and of the popup.

Thanks
Anne
Le 11 avr. 2014 à 21:11, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :

> I have just committed the fix.
>
> El 11-04-2014, a las 14:10, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> escribió:
>
>> Juraj is currently working on the border
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, we migrated the Customizable System Complexity view of the Moose Panel from Roassal to Roassal2.
>>> The render is not so beautiful due to the border and the popUp.
>>> We hope that the behavior of the view remains the same.
>>>
>>> Leo, Kevin and Anne.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



-- 
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"