Minor type/miscategorization report.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Minor type/miscategorization report.

Jurko Gospodnetic
Hi.

  Just wanted to note that method PackageManager>>classRepackaged:from:to:
is commented as 'private', but is not placed in the 'private' category
(Dolphin
Smalltalk 5.1.3. default image).

  Btw. Is there some other place we should post/send such minor/cosmetic
reports if we want to or is it ok to just bombard the newsgroup like this?

 HTH,
    Jurko


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Minor type/miscategorization report.

Blair McGlashan
"Jurko Gospodnetiæ" <[hidden email]> wrote in message
news:c1nav6$bsh$[hidden email]...

>   Hi.
>
>   Just wanted to note that method PackageManager>>classRepackaged:from:to:
> is commented as 'private', but is not placed in the 'private' category
> (Dolphin
> Smalltalk 5.1.3. default image).
>
>   Btw. Is there some other place we should post/send such minor/cosmetic
> reports if we want to or is it ok to just bombard the newsgroup like this?
>

Well since no one has objected please continue to do so. I wouldn't bother
with public/private miscategorisations though; for future releases we have
modified the release procedure to correct these miscategorisations
automatically. Also we'll include a patch in PL4 (#1505) that corrects all
such miscategorisations.

Regards

Blair


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Minor type/miscategorization report.

Jurko Gospodnetic
Hi Blair.

> Well since no one has objected please continue to do so. I wouldn't bother
> with public/private miscategorisations though; for future releases we have
> modified the release procedure to correct these miscategorisations
> automatically. Also we'll include a patch in PL4 (#1505) that corrects all
> such miscategorisations.

  Ok, thanks for replying!

  Best regards,
    Jurko