Missing mcz versions

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Missing mcz versions

Stephan Eggermont-3
Projects that load packages using Metacello, tend not to look in Pharo50
and Pharo50Inbox for new versions of those packages.

I noticed the Rubric version in Moose 6 to be significantly behind the
one in Pharo 5... Can we automatically copy back the inbox/integrator
version to its repo?

Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Missing mcz versions

Tudor Girba-2
Perhaps we could have a CI job that does this copying. In the meantime, could you copy the missing versions in the Rubric repo?

Cheers,
Doru

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote:
Projects that load packages using Metacello, tend not to look in Pharo50 and Pharo50Inbox for new versions of those packages.

I noticed the Rubric version in Moose 6 to be significantly behind the one in Pharo 5... Can we automatically copy back the inbox/integrator version to its repo?

Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Missing mcz versions

stepharo
In addition once the latest rubric and ft are integrated I (or somebody else) will update their configuration.
We did this way because there was dependencies and we would have a broken system between integration.

Le 11/10/15 07:41, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Perhaps we could have a CI job that does this copying. In the meantime, could you copy the missing versions in the Rubric repo?

Cheers,
Doru

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote:
Projects that load packages using Metacello, tend not to look in Pharo50 and Pharo50Inbox for new versions of those packages.

I noticed the Rubric version in Moose 6 to be significantly behind the one in Pharo 5... Can we automatically copy back the inbox/integrator version to its repo?

Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--

"Every thing has its own flow"


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev