Ken,
I think that'd probably be fine. If it works for you, then it is definitely fine!
Dale
----- Original Message -----
| From: "Ken Treis" <
[hidden email]>
| To: "GemStone Seaside beta discussion" <
[hidden email]>
| Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:35:33 PM
| Subject: [GS/SS Beta] MockGemStone Packages
|
| I'm using the MockGemStone-ServiceTask package, which is working
| nicely (thanks Nick!). But the MockGemStone package thinks the
| MockGemStone-ServiceTask category belongs to it. So no matter which
| of these two packages you load first, the other thinks it's been
| dirtied.
|
|
| Any reason why we shouldn't just roll the MockGemStone-ServiceTask
| package into MockGemStone itself?
|
|
| --
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ken Treis
| Miriam Technologies, Inc.
|