MockGemStone Packages

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

MockGemStone Packages

Ken Treis
I'm using the MockGemStone-ServiceTask package, which is working nicely (thanks Nick!). But the MockGemStone package thinks the MockGemStone-ServiceTask category belongs to it. So no matter which of these two packages you load first, the other thinks it's been dirtied.

Any reason why we shouldn't just roll the MockGemStone-ServiceTask package into MockGemStone itself?

--
Ken Treis
Miriam Technologies, Inc.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MockGemStone Packages

Dale Henrichs
Ken,

I think that'd probably be fine. If it works for you, then it is definitely fine!

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Ken Treis" <[hidden email]>
| To: "GemStone Seaside beta discussion" <[hidden email]>
| Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:35:33 PM
| Subject: [GS/SS Beta] MockGemStone Packages
|
| I'm using the MockGemStone-ServiceTask package, which is working
| nicely (thanks Nick!). But the MockGemStone package thinks the
| MockGemStone-ServiceTask category belongs to it. So no matter which
| of these two packages you load first, the other thinks it's been
| dirtied.
|
|
| Any reason why we shouldn't just roll the MockGemStone-ServiceTask
| package into MockGemStone itself?
|
|
| --
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ken Treis
| Miriam Technologies, Inc.
|