Model Smalltalk Projects

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Model Smalltalk Projects

horrido
Someone interested in Smalltalk would like to examine (assess) some "model Smalltalk projects" from, say, GitHub. He would like to see the code quality and versatility of the language. Can anyone suggest some projects he could look at? I don't want to point him to weak projects. Thanks.

(He's a Scala specialist, if you want to know.)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Model Smalltalk Projects

abergel
I would say Roassal.

Alexandre

> Le 18 févr. 2017 à 10:19, horrido <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> Someone interested in Smalltalk would like to examine (assess) some "model
> Smalltalk projects" from, say, GitHub. He would like to see the code quality
> and versatility of the language. Can anyone suggest some projects he could
> look at? I don't want to point him to weak projects. Thanks.
>
> (He's a Scala specialist, if you want to know.)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Model-Smalltalk-Projects-tp4934898.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Model Smalltalk Projects

Thierry Goubier
In reply to this post by horrido
Le 18/02/2017 à 14:19, horrido a écrit :
> Someone interested in Smalltalk would like to examine (assess) some "model
> Smalltalk projects" from, say, GitHub. He would like to see the code quality
> and versatility of the language. Can anyone suggest some projects he could
> look at? I don't want to point him to weak projects. Thanks.

I'd say Seaside on GitHub: https://github.com/SeasideSt/Seaside. I also
like FileTree (https://github.com/dalehenrich/filetree), for the fact it
supports with CI a significant number of targets and versions on each
target.

> (He's a Scala specialist, if you want to know.)

As long as he is ready to recognize that Smalltalk code has the same
patterns as Scala without the types (*), he should be fine.

(*) Except for the patterns that only exists to cope with the type
system, obviously...

Regards,

Thierry

>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Model-Smalltalk-Projects-tp4934898.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>