Hey all.. I got my first paying gig that i am able to use pharo with, and i am on the last leg before calling it complete. Here’s what I need to do.. This application accepts SMS text messages. It allows the user to send images via MMS and place an order to a print house for those images.. it then compiles the order, and submits it to the order processing system and makes the prints. The last thing I need to zero in on is handling the interaction. Believe it or not, I have never modeled such an interaction. The interaction goes: - user sends images{s) - bot says ‘thanks’ and asks if there are more - user types ‘done’ or sends more - on ‘done’ bot asks for print size - bot says ‘thanks’ and the interaction is done. order is processed. my first inclination is to use a state machine, progressing through order each time the user enters ‘done’.. does this sound reasonable, or is there a better model/design pattern for this interaction? Thanks! ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary Public Key: http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 #BitMessage BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV http://www.Village-Buzz.com http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 signature.asc (852 bytes) Download Attachment |
Hi sergio
super! I'm really happy for you. just this makes pharo and all our effort worth it.
Yes it seems. After you could also have a queue of command.
You can look at the state pattern. It is good for implementing state machine. Stef
-- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
In reply to this post by sergio_101
This may be overkill for your use but would love to have an MIT licensed set of classes that allow for/enable something like this:
https://medium.com/assist/theres-a-dozen-ways-to-order-a-coffee-why-do-dumb-bots-only-allow-one-27230542636d#.laljhpyt5
|
Looks awesome. Now, how hard would it be to reuse a WATask from Seaside from normal, non web code? A lot of WAxxx concepts could be brought back into nornal "Spec/Morphic" apps, like WASession, WATask, filters etc. Phil On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker <[hidden email]> wrote: This may be overkill for your use but would love to have an MIT licensed set |
In reply to this post by Paul DeBruicker
On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 00:42:44 +0100, Paul DeBruicker <[hidden email]>
wrote: > This may be overkill for your use but would love to have an MIT licensed > set > of classes that allow for/enable something like this: > > > https://medium.com/assist/theres-a-dozen-ways-to-order-a-coffee-why-do-dumb-bots-only-allow-one-27230542636d#.laljhpyt5 looks nice. the first step is to have something basic and improve. Stef |
In reply to this post by philippeback
Indeed and we can accept them and cocoon them :) |
In reply to this post by sergio_101
Your using an object-oriented language, why not use an object domain model? Consider that Kristen Nygaard stated that an object-oriented "program execution is regarded as a physical model, simulating the behavior of either a real or imaginary part of the world." By physical model, he really is meaning a "direct model" where you directly represent the concepts of your problem domain as objects that interact with each other.
Sure, you could use a state machine, but why build a model (your domain problem) on top of a model (a state machine) using a paradigm intended to support a different way. State machines are a favored way to model process and state in functional programming. A domain model would separate the user interaction from your domain problem itself. You would model an Order that knows a User and one or more Images. Anyway, hopefully some food for thought. -- Aryeh |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |