I discovered a problem with Monticello. I'm not 100% sure but I think it occurs since I upgraded Metacello. If I press changes on my package in Monticello I get "source same but rev changed" on all methods in that package. Even if I try to load the last version from the repository and press changes afterwards I get this.
This is quite annoying because I can hardly find any real changes in this huge list. Do you have any ideas why this could happen? norbert |
Norbert,
I have seen something like this occur occassionally, but I haven't been able to pin it down ... it disappears before I can figure it out ... was the package written from Pharo? Dale ----- "Norbert Hartl" <[hidden email]> wrote: | I discovered a problem with Monticello. I'm not 100% sure but I think | it occurs since I upgraded Metacello. If I press changes on my package | in Monticello I get "source same but rev changed" on all methods in | that package. Even if I try to load the last version from the | repository and press changes afterwards I get this. | | This is quite annoying because I can hardly find any real changes in | this huge list. | | Do you have any ideas why this could happen? | | norbert |
Dale,
my problem persists. The package has been written mostly from pharo but also from gemstone. What makes me wonder is that I forced loading of the actual version via monticello and still I get those revision changes. Norbert On 13.04.2010, at 18:57, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Norbert, > > I have seen something like this occur occassionally, but I haven't been able to pin it down ... it disappears before I can figure it out ... was the package written from Pharo? > > Dale > ----- "Norbert Hartl" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > | I discovered a problem with Monticello. I'm not 100% sure but I think > | it occurs since I upgraded Metacello. If I press changes on my package > | in Monticello I get "source same but rev changed" on all methods in > | that package. Even if I try to load the last version from the > | repository and press changes afterwards I get this. > | > | This is quite annoying because I can hardly find any real changes in > | this huge list. > | > | Do you have any ideas why this could happen? > | > | norbert |
Could you ship me the mcz file so I can take a look?
Dale ----- "Norbert Hartl" <[hidden email]> wrote: | Dale, | | my problem persists. The package has been written mostly from pharo | but also from gemstone. What makes me wonder is that I forced loading | of the actual version via monticello and still I get those revision | changes. | | Norbert | | On 13.04.2010, at 18:57, Dale Henrichs wrote: | | > Norbert, | > | > I have seen something like this occur occassionally, but I haven't | been able to pin it down ... it disappears before I can figure it out | ... was the package written from Pharo? | > | > Dale | > ----- "Norbert Hartl" <[hidden email]> wrote: | > | > | I discovered a problem with Monticello. I'm not 100% sure but I | think | > | it occurs since I upgraded Metacello. If I press changes on my | package | > | in Monticello I get "source same but rev changed" on all methods | in | > | that package. Even if I try to load the last version from the | > | repository and press changes afterwards I get this. | > | | > | This is quite annoying because I can hardly find any real changes | in | > | this huge list. | > | | > | Do you have any ideas why this could happen? | > | | > | norbert |
The last messages didn't make its way to the mailing list. As I said the weird behaviour occurs on many packages.
Since yesterday two packages of my own turned back to normal. Well, kind of normal. If I now do the "changes" I get only real changes but every change is the opposite direction. I've added some method locally but the changes window tells "(removed)" and it is displayed with strike-through font. And changed parts are displayed wrong as well. Maybe this is part of the problem I encounter. Norbert On 15.04.2010, at 01:16, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Could you ship me the mcz file so I can take a look? > > Dale > ----- "Norbert Hartl" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > | Dale, > | > | my problem persists. The package has been written mostly from pharo > | but also from gemstone. What makes me wonder is that I forced loading > | of the actual version via monticello and still I get those revision > | changes. > | > | Norbert > | > | On 13.04.2010, at 18:57, Dale Henrichs wrote: > | > | > Norbert, > | > > | > I have seen something like this occur occassionally, but I haven't > | been able to pin it down ... it disappears before I can figure it out > | ... was the package written from Pharo? > | > > | > Dale > | > ----- "Norbert Hartl" <[hidden email]> wrote: > | > > | > | I discovered a problem with Monticello. I'm not 100% sure but I > | think > | > | it occurs since I upgraded Metacello. If I press changes on my > | package > | > | in Monticello I get "source same but rev changed" on all methods > | in > | > | that package. Even if I try to load the last version from the > | > | repository and press changes afterwards I get this. > | > | > | > | This is quite annoying because I can hardly find any real changes > | in > | > | this huge list. > | > | > | > | Do you have any ideas why this could happen? > | > | > | > | norbert |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |