Hi!
Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce. I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some remote pair programming. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi Alex Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the remaining issues.
Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very annoying for me :) -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi,
As I see it the only critical issue that is hard is: http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=293 This is hard because I do not know what causes it. I will give it another try on Wednesday/Thursday, but if it does not work, I will move it to 4.1. Alex, it would be great if you could take a look at: http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=177 This is preventing us to create figures that are defined via the FormsBuilder and that also have nested graphs. For example, right now, a UML Class is implemented by hardcoding the methods in the shape. This means that we cannot click on the methods inside. Cheers, Doru On 13 Apr 2010, at 16:12, Simon Denier wrote: > > On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and >> closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce. > > Hi Alex > > Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the > remaining issues. > > >> >> I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I >> would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some >> remote pair programming. > > > Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very > annoying for me :) > > > -- > Simon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Problem solving should be concentrated on describing the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3
I will work on these...
Alexandre On 13 Apr 2010, at 10:12, Simon Denier wrote: > > On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and >> closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce. > > Hi Alex > > Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the > remaining issues. > > >> >> I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I >> would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some >> remote pair programming. > > > Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very > annoying for me :) > > > -- > Simon > > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |