Moose 4.0?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Moose 4.0?

Alexandre Bergel
Hi!

Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and  
closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.

I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I would  
like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some remote pair  
programming.

Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Moose 4.0?

Simon Denier-3

On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

Hi!

Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.

Hi Alex

Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the remaining issues.



I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some remote pair programming.


Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very annoying for me :)


--
 Simon




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Moose 4.0?

Tudor Girba
Hi,

As I see it the only critical issue that is hard is:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=293

This is hard because I do not know what causes it. I will give it  
another try on Wednesday/Thursday, but if it does not work, I will  
move it to 4.1.

Alex, it would be great if you could take a look at:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=177

This is preventing us to create figures that are defined via the  
FormsBuilder and that also have nested graphs. For example, right now,  
a UML Class is implemented by hardcoding the methods in the shape.  
This means that we cannot click on the methods inside.

Cheers,
Doru


On 13 Apr 2010, at 16:12, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and  
>> closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.
>
> Hi Alex
>
> Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the  
> remaining issues.
>
>
>>
>> I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I  
>> would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some  
>> remote pair programming.
>
>
> Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very  
> annoying for me :)
>
>
> --
>  Simon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Problem solving should be concentrated on describing
the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution."



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Moose 4.0?

Alexandre Bergel
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3
I will work on these...

Alexandre


On 13 Apr 2010, at 10:12, Simon Denier wrote:

>
> On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and  
>> closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.
>
> Hi Alex
>
> Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the  
> remaining issues.
>
>
>>
>> I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I  
>> would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some  
>> remote pair programming.
>
>
> Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very  
> annoying for me :)
>
>
> --
>  Simon
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev